Paper · 1974 · Environmental Entomology

Evidence for Nonpreference and Antibiosis in Aphid-resistant Red Raspberry Cultivars12

G. G. Kennedy; G. A. Schaefers

10
claims
27
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars. Mortality was greatest on Canby > Malling Exploit > Washington > Latham (susceptible). It occurred primarily in the 1st and 2nd instars on Canby and Malling Exploit, but was distributed throughout all instars on Washington. Development was slow on Canby and Washington, while developmental time on Malling Exploit was comparable to the susceptible Latham. Fecundity was lowest on Canby < Washington < Malling Exploit = Latham. Prereproductive adults from Canby and Washington weighed significantly less than those from Latham. In no-choice situations, the aphids deserted both Canby and Malling Exploit plants, indicating that resistance operates as a nonpreference in both cases. In a no-choice situation, aphids did not desert the cultivar Washington, thus supporting the conclusion that resistance in this case operates as antibiosis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid mortality ranked Canby above Malling Exploit, Washington and Latham.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Canbye0
Interactor
Amphorophora agathonica HottesAmphorophora agathonicae1peste0
Outcome
Mortalitye0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · InteractorU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mortality was greatest on Canby > Malling Exploit > Washington > Latham (susceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid mortality was early instar on Canby and Malling Exploit but spread over instars on Washington.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Canbye0
Interactor
Amphorophora agathonica HottesAmphorophora agathonicae1peste0
Outcome
1st and 2nd instarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · InteractorU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It occurred primarily in the 1st and 2nd instars on Canby and Malling Exploit, but was distributed throughout all instars on Washington”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid development was slow on Canby and Washington.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Canbye0
Interactor
Amphorophora agathonica HottesAmphorophora agathonicae1peste0
Outcome
Developmente0
Direction
slowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · InteractorU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Development was slow on Canby and Washington, while developmental time on Malling Exploit was comparable to the susceptible Latham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid developmental time on Malling Exploit resembled Latham.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Malling Exploite0
Interactor
Amphorophora agathonica HottesAmphorophora agathonicae1peste0
Outcome
developmental timee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
Lathame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · InteractorU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“developmental time on Malling Exploit was comparable to the susceptible Latham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid fecundity was lowest on Canby, then Washington, with Malling Exploit equaling Latham.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Canbye0
Interactor
Amphorophora agathonica HottesAmphorophora agathonicae1peste0
Outcome
Fecunditye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · InteractorU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fecundity was lowest on Canby < Washington < Malling Exploit = Latham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prereproductive adults from Canby weighed significantly less than those from Latham.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Canbye0
Interactor
Amphorophora agathonica HottesAmphorophora agathonicae1peste0
Outcome
Prereproductive adultse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
Lathame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · InteractorU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prereproductive adults from Canby and Washington weighed significantly less than those from Latham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prereproductive adults from Washington weighed significantly less than those from Latham.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Washingtone0
Interactor
Amphorophora agathonica HottesAmphorophora agathonicae1peste0
Outcome
Prereproductive adultse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
Lathame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · InteractorU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prereproductive adults from Canby and Washington weighed significantly less than those from Latham”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The survival, developmental time, and reproductive rates of Amphorophora agathonica Hottes were measured in the laboratory on 4 red raspberry cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids deserted Canby in no-choice conditions, consistent with nonpreference.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Canbye0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphids desertede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In no-choice situations, the aphids deserted both Canby and Malling Exploit plants, indicating that resistance operates as a nonpreference in both cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids deserted Malling Exploit in no-choice conditions, consistent with nonpreference.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Malling Exploite0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphids desertede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In no-choice situations, the aphids deserted both Canby and Malling Exploit plants, indicating that resistance operates as a nonpreference in both cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids did not desert Washington, supporting antibiosis resistance.

Taxon
Red Raspberry CultivarsRubus idaeust0
Material
Washingtone0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphids did not deserte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aphids did not desert the cultivar Washington, thus supporting the conclusion that resistance in this case operates as antibiosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑