Paper · 1997 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Sugar Use in Relation to Shoot Induction by Sorbitol and Cytokinin in Apple

Saila T. Karhu

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
46
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Microshoots of `McIntosh' apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) were grown on Murashige-Skoog (MS) nutrient medium supplemented with either sucrose or sorbitol or with sucrose and an elevated level of cytokinin. Shoot growth was recorded and concentrations of fructose, glucose, sorbitol, and sucrose were analyzed in nutrient media and shoots during a 6-week subculture period. Axillary branching was stimulated by high cytokinin and sorbitol media, with increased biomass production and carbohydrate use on the high-BA medium only. The sucrose in the nutrient medium was hydrolyzed to fructose and glucose, which were equally taken up by shoots. Sorbitol was taken up somewhat less effectively. The elevated level of BA decreased sucrose hydrolysis in the nutrient medium. There were high concentrations of sorbitol in shoots grown on the sorbitol medium, and sorbitol also accumulated at the end of the culture period in shoots grown on sucrose. The amount of sucrose was low, and glucose was more abundant than fructose in microshoots. The starch content of leaves was not affected by treatments or sampling time. Chemical names used: N 6 -benzyladenine (BA).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High cytokinin stimulated apple microshoot axillary branching.

Treatment
high cytokinine0
Outcome
Axillary branchinge0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Axillary branching was stimulated by high cytokinin and sorbitol media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol medium stimulated apple microshoot axillary branching.

Treatment
sorbitol mediae0
Outcome
Axillary branchinge0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Axillary branching was stimulated by high cytokinin and sorbitol media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High BA medium increased biomass production and carbohydrate use.

Treatment
high-BA mediume0
Outcome
biomass production and carbohydrate usee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased biomass production and carbohydrate use on the high-BA medium only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose in the medium was hydrolyzed to fructose and glucose.

Outcome
sucrose in the nutrient medium was hydrolyzed to fructose and glucosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sucrose in the nutrient medium was hydrolyzed to fructose and glucose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple shoots took up fructose and glucose equally.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
fructose and glucose, which were equally taken upe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fructose and glucose, which were equally taken up by shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple shoots took up sorbitol somewhat less effectively.

Outcome
Sorbitol was taken upe0
Direction
somewhat less effectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorbitol was taken up somewhat less effectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated BA decreased sucrose hydrolysis in apple nutrient medium.

Treatment
elevated level of BAe0
Outcome
sucrose hydrolysise0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated level of BA decreased sucrose hydrolysis in the nutrient medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots grown on sorbitol medium had high sorbitol concentrations.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
sorbitol mediume0
Outcome
high concentrations of sorbitole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high concentrations of sorbitol in shoots grown on the sorbitol medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol accumulated at the end of culture in shoots grown on sucrose.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
sorbitole0
Direction
accumulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorbitol also accumulated at the end of the culture period in shoots grown on sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose amount in apple microshoots was low.

Outcome
amount of sucrosee0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of sucrose was low, and glucose was more abundant than fructose in microshoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose was more abundant than fructose in apple microshoots.

Outcome
glucosee0
Direction
more abundante0
Comparator
fructosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glucose was more abundant than fructose in microshoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments and sampling time did not affect apple leaf starch content.

Outcome
starch content of leavese0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The starch content of leaves was not affected by treatments or sampling time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑

glucitol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

in vitro · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

class · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 38 positive, 8 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

in vitro · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.