Paper · 2010 · Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America

Effect of drying on selected proximate composition of fresh and processed fruits and seeds of two pumpkin species

M. Fedha; M. Mwasaru; C. Njoroge; et al.

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya to investigate the effect of drying on the proximate composition of crude fibre, crude fat and carbohydrates of two species of pumpkins namely, C. moschata and C. maxima in the year 2006. the treatments comprised fruits with rind and those without rind (fruit pulp), whole seeds and seed kernels, and raw and dry samples (flour). The experimental design was completely randomized and data analysis was by Genstat package. Proximate composition of raw C. moschata fruit with rind was 87.9% moisture (fresh weight), 4.9g/100g crude protein and 6.7g/100g crude ash. The corresponding values of C. maxima were 87.0/100g, 3.9g/100g and 6.9g/100g on dry weight basis. C. moschata with rind contained significantly (P <0.05) higher crude fat than C. moschata seeds. The results also showed that there was significantly (P< 0.05) more crude protein in C. maxima than C. moschata. Similar results were obtained for moisture content. The conclusion is that pumpkin seeds are rich in protein and both species of pumpkin contain high moisture content in their fruits, yielding a dry matter of approximately 12% on dehydration. Pumpkin seeds contain low moisture levels of 5.7% -6.1% making them be stored for longer duration.Pumpkin seeds are a better source of protein hence contributes substantially to the dietary human nutrition. Crude ash content of pumpkin fruits was higher than that for seeds showing that mineral intake in the diet can be enhanced by increasing the consumption of pumpkin fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw C. moschata fruit with rind had 87.9% moisture.

Taxon
C. moschatae0
Organ / stage
fruit with rinde0
Outcome
moisturee0
Value
87.9%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Proximate composition of raw C. moschata fruit with rind was 87.9% moisture (fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–600 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw C. moschata fruit with rind had 4.9g/100g crude protein.

Taxon
C. moschatae0
Organ / stage
fruit with rinde0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Value
4.9g/100ge0

Verbatim

e0

“raw C. moschata fruit with rind was 87.9% moisture (fresh weight), 4.9g/100g crude protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw C. moschata fruit with rind had 6.7g/100g crude ash.

Taxon
C. moschatae0
Organ / stage
fruit with rinde0
Outcome
crude ashe0
Value
6.7g/100ge0

Verbatim

e0

“raw C. moschata fruit with rind was 87.9% moisture (fresh weight), 4.9g/100g crude protein and 6.7g/100g crude ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. maxima had a reported moisture value of 87.0/100g.

Taxon
C. maximae0
Outcome
moisturee1
Value
87.0/100ge0

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding values of C. maxima were 87.0/100g, 3.9g/100g and 6.9g/100g on dry weight basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“87.9% moisture (fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–600 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. maxima had 3.9g/100g crude protein.

Taxon
C. maximae0
Outcome
crude proteine1
Value
3.9g/100ge0

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding values of C. maxima were 87.0/100g, 3.9g/100g and 6.9g/100g on dry weight basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“4.9g/100g crude protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. maxima had 6.9g/100g crude ash.

Taxon
C. maximae0
Outcome
crude ashe1
Value
6.9g/100ge0

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding values of C. maxima were 87.0/100g, 3.9g/100g and 6.9g/100g on dry weight basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“6.7g/100g crude ash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–649 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. moschata fruit with rind had significantly higher crude fat than its seeds.

Taxon
C. moschatae0
Organ / stage
with rinde0
Outcome
crude fate0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
C. moschata seedse0

Verbatim

e0

“C. moschata with rind contained significantly (P <0.05) higher crude fat than C. moschata seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–845 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. maxima had significantly more crude protein than C. moschata.

Taxon
C. maximae0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
C. moschatae0

Verbatim

e0

“there was significantly (P< 0.05) more crude protein in C. maxima than C. moschata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–958 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. maxima also had more moisture than C. moschata.

Taxon
C. maximae0
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
C. moschatae0

Verbatim

e0

“there was significantly (P< 0.05) more crude protein in C. maxima than C. moschata. Similar results were obtained for moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin fruits yielded approximately 12% dry matter after dehydration.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
dehydratione0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
approximately 12%e0

Verbatim

e0

“both species of pumpkin contain high moisture content in their fruits, yielding a dry matter of approximately 12% on dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin seeds had 5.7% -6.1% moisture.

Taxon
Pumpkine0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Outcome
moisture levelse0
Value
5.7% -6.1%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Pumpkin seeds contain low moisture levels of 5.7% -6.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1258 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin fruit had more crude ash than seeds.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
Crude ash contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
seedse0

Verbatim

e0

“Crude ash content of pumpkin fruits was higher than that for seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1476 · show in text ↑