Abstract
Grandlure-baited in⋅field traps used at the rate of 10/acre captured 76% of a population of overwintered Anthonomus grandis Boheman estimated to number ca. 25/acre that emerged between the time cotton was planted and the time the plants produced pinhead squares. A combination of in-field traps and insecticides captured or killed 100% of the emerging overwintered weevils during the 23 days between the pinhead square stage of plant growth (June 13) and July 6. The traps alone captured ca. 96% of a late emerging population of ca. 1 boll weevil/acre during July 6–31. The problem of clumping of F1 and F2 progeny proved to be an important factor in the efficiency of the traps.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Grandlure traps captured 76% of overwintered weevils before cotton formed pinhead squares.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Grandlure-baited in⋅field traps used at the rate of 10/acree0
- Interactor
- Anthonomus grandis Boheman
Anthonomus grandise0pest - Outcome
- captured 76% of a population of overwintered Anthonomus grandis Bohemane0
- Direction
- capturede0
- Value
- 76%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Grandlure-baited in⋅field traps used at the rate of 10/acre captured 76% of a population of overwintered Anthonomus grandis Boheman estimated to number ca. 25/acre that emerged between the time cotton was planted and the time the plants produced pinhead squares.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined traps and insecticides captured or killed all emerging overwintered weevils during the stated 23 days.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- A combination of in-field traps and insecticidese0
- Interactor
- weevilsCurculionidaee0pest
- Outcome
- emerging overwintered weevilse0
- Direction
- captured or killede0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Boll Weevils”
e0“A combination of in-field traps and insecticides captured or killed 100% of the emerging overwintered weevils during the 23 days between the pinhead square stage of plant growth (June 13) and July 6.”
e1“cotton was planted”
Claim · model-written summary
Traps alone captured approximately 96% of a late emerging boll weevil population.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- traps alonee0
- Interactor
- boll weevil
Anthonomus grandise0pest - Outcome
- late emerging populatione0
- Direction
- capturede0
- Value
- ca. 96%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The traps alone captured ca. 96% of a late emerging population of ca. 1 boll weevil/acre during July 6–31.”
t0“Boll Weevils”
e1“cotton was planted”
Claim · model-written summary
Clumping of F1 and F2 progeny influenced trap efficiency.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Interactor
- progenye0pest
- Outcome
- efficiency of the trapse0
- Qualifier
- clumping of F1 and F2 progenye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Boll Weevils”
e0“The problem of clumping of F1 and F2 progeny proved to be an important factor in the efficiency of the traps.”
e1“cotton was planted”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · Curculionidae · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
trap barrier · Anthonomus grandis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.