Abstract
This experiment was carried out from May to October, 1949. At the 87 th meeting of the Crop Science Association, we reported the resume (Report 2)(no. 1) on the growth of root, which was a part of this experiment. This time we are going to report on the investigation about yields and growth. (1) In the pots filled up with water about 10 days beforehand of heading, in both direct sowing plots and transplanting plots, the growth of rice plant was retarded completely just like the one in the pots of upland field at the direct sowing plots. (2) The best time of the opening time of irrigation, in the direct sowing plots, is not clear as we found in old reports. In this experiment we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations, -the pots filled up with water on the first of July, the pots filled up from the beginning, and the pots on the 26 th of July. The rice plant obtained from the pots filled up with water on the 26 th of July, showed a little better than the others on their tops, leaf numbers, and tillers. This tendency might be attributable to the absorption of nutritive elements and their environments. (3) There were not a remarkable difference on the width and the length of the leaf among them, with the exception of the one from the pots of upland field. (4) Increasing rate of both tiller and top height was the greatest in ten days after filling up with water. (5) The most active time of tiller and the time when the top reach its highest, were delayed 2 or 3 days in case of the trans-planting plots compared with the one in the direct sowing plots. This delaying caused by transplanting is regarded as a physiological phenomenon and it seems to be out of any further discursion. (6) In comparing the direct sowing plots with the transplanting plots in the case of filling up water from the beginning, the weight of grains odtained from the former is superior 2.9% to the one from the latter, and more over when the former is filled up with water on the 1st of July it shows 2.6% more weight to the latter. On the other hand the weight of grains obtained from all other plots which we have not mentioned above are inferior to the one from transplanting plots filled up with water from the beginning. (7) As to the grain numbers of one head and head length, the direct sowing plots are inferior to the transplanting plots. And as to tiller the direct sowing plots are recorded to be superior to the transplanting plots. Thus it seems to us that they keep their balance on the whole in considering of their yields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Filling pots with water about 10 days before heading retarded rice growth completely, as in upland-field pots.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- pots filled up with water about 10 days beforehand of headinge0
- Outcome
- growth of rice plante0
- Direction
- retardede0
- Comparator
- pots of upland fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the pots filled up with water about 10 days beforehand of heading, in both direct sowing plots and transplanting plots, the growth of rice plant was retarded completely just like the one in the pots of upland field”
Claim · model-written summary
Among three irrigation opening times, rice growth in direct-sown pots showed no much difference.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- three different irrigationse1
- Outcome
- growth of rice plante1
- Direction
- could not find much differencee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice from pots filled with water on 26 July had slightly better tops, leaf numbers and tillers than the others.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae2
- Treatment
- pots filled up with water on the 26 th of Julye2
- Outcome
- their tops, leaf numbers, and tillerse2
- Direction
- a little bettere2
- Comparator
- the otherse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The rice plant obtained from the pots filled up with water on the 26 th of July, showed a little better than the others on their tops, leaf numbers, and tillers.”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf width and length showed no remarkable difference among the irrigation treatments, except for upland-field pots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Outcome
- the width and the length of the leafe3
- Qualifier
- with the exception of the one from the pots of upland fielde3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e3“There were not a remarkable difference on the width and the length of the leaf among them, with the exception of the one from the pots of upland field.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tiller and top height increased fastest during the first ten days after filling pots with water.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Outcome
- increasing rate of both tiller and top heighte4
- Direction
- greateste4
- Qualifier
- in ten days after filling up with watere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e4“Increasing rate of both tiller and top height was the greatest in ten days after filling up with water.”
Claim · model-written summary
In transplanted plots the most active time of tiller and the time of maximum top height were delayed 2 or 3 days versus direct sowing.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- trans-planting plotse5
- Outcome
- most active time of tillere5
- Direction
- delayede5
- Value
- 2 or 3 dayse5
- Comparator
- direct sowing plotse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e5“The most active time of tiller and the time when the top reach its highest, were delayed 2 or 3 days in case of the trans-planting plots compared with the one in the direct sowing plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct-sown plots with water from the beginning had 2.9% superior grain weight to transplanted plots with water from the beginning.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- direct sowing plotse6
- Outcome
- the weight of grainse6
- Direction
- superiore6
- Value
- 2.9%e6
- Qualifier
- filling up water from the beginninge6
- Comparator
- transplanting plotse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e6“In comparing the direct sowing plots with the transplanting plots in the case of filling up water from the beginning, the weight of grains odtained from the former is superior 2.9% to the one from the latter”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct-sown plots filled with water on 1 July had 2.6% more grain weight than the transplanted comparison.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- filled up with water on the 1st of Julye7
- Outcome
- weighte7
- Direction
- moree7
- Value
- 2.6%e7
- Comparator
- the lattere7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e7“when the former is filled up with water on the 1st of July it shows 2.6% more weight to the latter.”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain weight from all other plots was inferior to transplanted plots filled with water from the beginning.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- all other plotse2
- Outcome
- the weight of grainse2
- Direction
- inferiore2
- Comparator
- transplanting plots filled up with water from the beginninge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e2“the weight of grains obtained from all other plots which we have not mentioned above are inferior to the one from transplanting plots filled up with water from the beginning.”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct-sown plots had inferior grain numbers per head and head length compared with transplanted plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- direct sowing plotse2
- Outcome
- grain numbers of one head and head lengthe2
- Direction
- inferiore2
- Comparator
- transplanting plotse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e2“As to the grain numbers of one head and head length, the direct sowing plots are inferior to the transplanting plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct-sown plots had superior tiller numbers compared with transplanted plots.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- direct sowing plotse2
- Outcome
- tillere2
- Direction
- superiore2
- Comparator
- transplanting plotse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e2“And as to tiller the direct sowing plots are recorded to be superior to the transplanting plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct sowing and transplanting kept their balance overall in terms of yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Outcome
- yieldse2
- Qualifier
- they keep their balance on the wholee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“we could not find much difference on the growth of rice plant among three different irrigations”
e2“Thus it seems to us that they keep their balance on the whole in considering of their yields.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 222 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
1,074 papers more in this group
See all 1,078 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.