Paper · 1972 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Field Evaluation of Three Formulations of Aldicarb for Control of Cotton Insects12

J. W. Davis; C. B. Cowan

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Formulations of aldicarb on charcoal and on corn cob grits were equally effective in controlling the cotton fleahopper, Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter); the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover; and thrips in a field test. The charcoal formulation of aldicarb was less damaging to plant stands and had less adverse effect than the corn cob formulations on beneficial insects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulations controlled cotton fleahopper equally effectively.

Treatment
aldicarb on charcoale0
Interactor
Pseudatomoscelis seriatusPseudatomoscelis seriatuse0pest
Outcome
controlling the cotton fleahoppere0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
corn cob gritse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudatomoscelis seriatus
Pseudatomoscelis seriatus · Interactorxpda · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Formulations of aldicarb on charcoal and on corn cob grits were equally effective in controlling the cotton fleahopper, Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter);”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulations controlled cotton aphid equally effectively.

Treatment
aldicarb on charcoale0
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
cotton aphide0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
corn cob gritse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Formulations of aldicarb on charcoal and on corn cob grits were equally effective in controlling the cotton fleahopper, Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter); the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover; and thrips in a field test.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulations controlled thrips equally effectively.

Treatment
aldicarb on charcoale0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thripse0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
corn cob gritse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Formulations of aldicarb on charcoal and on corn cob grits were equally effective in controlling the cotton fleahopper, Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter); the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover; and thrips in a field test.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Charcoal aldicarb damaged plant stands less than corn cob aldicarb.

Treatment
charcoal formulation of aldicarbe0
Outcome
plant standse0
Direction
less damaginge0
Comparator
corn cob formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The charcoal formulation of aldicarb was less damaging to plant stands and had less adverse effect than the corn cob formulations on beneficial insects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Charcoal aldicarb had less adverse effect on beneficial insects than corn cob formulations.

Treatment
charcoal formulation of aldicarbe0
Interactor
beneficial insectse0other
Outcome
beneficial insectse0
Direction
less adverse effecte0
Comparator
corn cob formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The charcoal formulation of aldicarb was less damaging to plant stands and had less adverse effect than the corn cob formulations on beneficial insects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑

aldicarb · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

aldicarb · Pseudatomoscelis seriatus · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

aldicarb · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

aldicarb · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.