Abstract
Laboratory and glasshouse trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of Bacillus subtilis, Gliocladium virens and different concentrations of the fungicide quintozene (75% WP) against Sclerotium rolfsii, causing death of grapevines in nurseries. Bacillus subtilis treatment considerably reduced the growth of S. rolfsii in vitro compared to the control. Quintozene at concentrations of 0,4, 1,2, 2,0, and 3,2 g per litre mixed with PDA totally suppressed the growth of S. rolfsii. In the glasshouse B. subtilis gave poor control. G. virens reduced mortality of grapevine plants caused by S. rolfsii, while no mortality of plants occurred when vines or soil was treated with quintozene. Quintozene at a concentration of 2% can be recommended as control measure against S. rolfsii in nurseries.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus subtilis considerably reduced the in vitro growth of Sclerotium rolfsii compared to the control.
- Treatment
- Bacillus subtilise1
- Interactor
- S. rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen - Second interactor
- Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- growth of S. rolfsiie1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- the controle1
- Setting
- in vitroe1
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chemical and Biological Control of Sclerotium rolfsii in Grapevine Nurseries”
e1“Bacillus subtilis treatment considerably reduced the growth of S. rolfsii in vitro compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Quintozene at 0.4 to 3.2 g per litre totally suppressed the in vitro growth of Sclerotium rolfsii.
- Treatment
- Quintozene at concentrations of 0,4, 1,2, 2,0, and 3,2 g per litree2
- Interactor
- S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie2pathogen
- Outcome
- growth of S. rolfsiie2
- Direction
- suppressede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chemical and Biological Control of Sclerotium rolfsii in Grapevine Nurseries”
e2“Quintozene at concentrations of 0,4, 1,2, 2,0, and 3,2 g per litre mixed with PDA totally suppressed the growth of S. rolfsii”
Claim · model-written summary
Gliocladium virens reduced mortality of grapevine plants caused by Sclerotium rolfsii.
- Treatment
- G. virense3
- Interactor
- S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie3pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. virensTrichoderma virense3biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- mortality of grapevine plantse3
- Direction
- reducede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chemical and Biological Control of Sclerotium rolfsii in Grapevine Nurseries”
e3“G. virens reduced mortality of grapevine plants caused by S. rolfsii”
Claim · model-written summary
No plant mortality occurred when vines or soil were treated with quintozene.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chemical and Biological Control of Sclerotium rolfsii in Grapevine Nurseries”
e4“no mortality of plants occurred when vines or soil was treated with quintozene”
Claim · model-written summary
Quintozene at 2% can be recommended as a control measure against Sclerotium rolfsii in nurseries.
- Treatment
- Quintozene at a concentration of 2%e5
- Interactor
- S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie5pathogen
- Outcome
- control measure against S. rolfsiie5
- Setting
- nurseriese5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chemical and Biological Control of Sclerotium rolfsii in Grapevine Nurseries”
e5“Quintozene at a concentration of 2% can be recommended as control measure against S. rolfsii in nurseries”
Claim · model-written summary
In the glasshouse, Bacillus subtilis gave poor control of Sclerotium rolfsii.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chemical and Biological Control of Sclerotium rolfsii in Grapevine Nurseries”
e6“In the glasshouse B. subtilis gave poor control”
The same questions in other papers
Bacillus subtilis · control · VitisPositive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
pentachloronitrobenzene · pest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.