Paper · 2003 · Seed Science and Technology

Water content and the effectiveness of hydro and osmotic priming of cotton seeds

M.E. Toselli; E.C. Casenave

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The water content reached by seeds during priming treatments depends on the incubation conditions and seldom is this variable considered when analyzing the degree of success obtained by this treatment. The objectives of this investigation were to study the kinetics of imbibition of cotton seeds in water and in polyethylene glycol and to evaluate the effectiveness of the different treatments based upon the osmoticum used and the water content achieved by the seeds. Curves of imbibition in water and in polyethylene glycol -0.8 and -2.2 MPa were determined. Based on these curves, the durations of priming in water and in both concentrations of polyethylene glycol that achivied the same water content (7, 20, 30 and 40%) were selected for further treatments. Seed germination in water and under water stress (polyethylene glycol -0.8 MPa) was evaluated at 25°C and 16 h photoperiod. Hydropriming did not affect germination in water or under water stress. Osmotic priming reduced germination in both instances by increasing the length of the treatment and the concentration of osmoticum used. The inhibition produced by osmotic priming was more marked under water stress. For cotton seeds, osmotic priming with polyethylene glycol is not to be recommended and the effectiveness of the treatments does not depend exclusively on the priming water content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming did not affect cotton seed germination in water or under water stress.

Treatment
Hydropriminge1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
under water stresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“priming of cotton seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hydropriming did not affect germination in water or under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic priming with polyethylene glycol reduced cotton seed germination.

Treatment
Osmotic priminge2
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
by increasing the length of the treatment and the concentration of osmoticum usede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“priming of cotton seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Osmotic priming reduced germination in both instances by increasing the length of the treatment and the concentration of osmoticum used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1094 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inhibition of cotton seed germination by osmotic priming was more marked under water stress.

Treatment
osmotic priminge3
Outcome
inhibitione3
Direction
more markede3
Qualifier
under water stresse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“priming of cotton seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“The inhibition produced by osmotic priming was more marked under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1173 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effectiveness of the priming treatments in cotton does not depend exclusively on the priming water content.

Treatment
priming water contente4
Outcome
effectiveness of the treatmentse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“priming of cotton seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“the effectiveness of the treatments does not depend exclusively on the priming water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1355 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic priming with polyethylene glycol is not recommended for cotton seeds.

Outcome
osmotic priming with polyethylene glycole5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“For cotton seeds, osmotic priming with polyethylene glycol is not to be recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1258 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.