Paper · 2014 · Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics & Sociology

Tea Oil Camellia Plantation, an Enormous Potentiality for Poverty Reduction

Hoang Thang

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: Apply different silvicultural approaches to improve oil productivity and quality from abandoned stands and analyze cost-benefit of developing tea oil camellias. Study Design: Three experiments were conducted as (1) Changing canopy of 36-year-old plantation by grafting, (2) Using Bortrac fertilizer for promoting fruiting by spraying to canopy, and (3) Stem/branch thinning and fertilizing. Place: North Central, Vietnam at 19º16’N and 105º23’E. Methodology: Shoots of 4 – 6 mm in diameter and 3 -5 cm long from improved cultivar were used to graft to 36-year-old trees. Bortrac fertilizer was used to spray to canopy of 15-year-old plantation when trees bloomed. While three treatments of stem/branch thinning and fertilizing at different intensities was applied to 29-year-old plantation of 830 trees ha-1. Results: The results showed that old stand, which has low seed productivity, could be replaced by a new canopy through grafting with improved cultivars. Meanwhile, fertilizing through spraying on canopy at early blooming peak with Bortrac fertilizer increased seed productivity by 28%. In addition, applying 0.5 kg inorganic fertilizer (NPK) and 5 kg organic manure per tree coupled with thinning under crown-old branches and diseased branches increased up to 60% seed productivity and improved oil ratio and quality. Cost-benefit analysis indicated that by applying different intensities of stem/branch thinning and fertilizing to 29-year-old plantation, profit margin increased from US$ 502 to as much as US$ 549 ha-1 year-1 for growers selling dry seeds as final product. Meanwhile, it increased from US$ 1,791 to US$ 2,426 ha-1 year-1 by extracting oil for final product. Conclusion: There is a potentiality of growing tea oil camellia with the increased profit of as much as US$ 2,426 ha-1 year-1 for 29-year-old plantation by applying intensive silvicultural approach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting improved cultivars could replace the low producing canopy of old stands.

Taxon
Tea Oil CamelliaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
grafting with improved cultivarse0
Outcome
replaced by a new canopye0
Comparator
old stande0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“old stand, which has low seed productivity, could be replaced by a new canopy through grafting with improved cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Oil Camellia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bortrac canopy spray at early blooming increased seed productivity by 28%.

Taxon
Tea Oil CamelliaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
spraying on canopy at early blooming peak with Bortrac fertilizere0
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying on canopy at early blooming peak with Bortrac fertilizer increased seed productivity by 28%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Oil Camellia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization and branch thinning increased seed productivity by up to 60%.

Taxon
Tea Oil CamelliaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
applying 0.5 kg inorganic fertilizer (NPK) and 5 kg organic manure per tree coupled with thinning under crown-old branches and diseased branchese0
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 0.5 kg inorganic fertilizer (NPK) and 5 kg organic manure per tree coupled with thinning under crown-old branches and diseased branches increased up to 60% seed productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Oil Camellia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fertilization and thinning improved oil ratio and quality.

Taxon
Tea Oil CamelliaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
applying 0.5 kg inorganic fertilizer (NPK) and 5 kg organic manure per tree coupled with thinning under crown-old branches and diseased branchese0
Outcome
oil ratio and qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 0.5 kg inorganic fertilizer (NPK) and 5 kg organic manure per tree coupled with thinning under crown-old branches and diseased branches increased up to 60% seed productivity and improved oil ratio and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Oil Camellia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning and fertilizing increased profit for dry seed sales from US$ 502 to US$ 549 per hectare per year.

Taxon
Tea Oil CamelliaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
different intensities of stem/branch thinning and fertilizinge0
Outcome
profit margine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
US$ 549 ha-1 year-1e0
Qualifier
US$ 502e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by applying different intensities of stem/branch thinning and fertilizing to 29-year-old plantation, profit margin increased from US$ 502 to as much as US$ 549 ha-1 year-1 for growers selling dry seeds as final product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Oil Camellia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning and fertilizing increased profit for extracted oil from US$ 1,791 to US$ 2,426 per hectare per year.

Taxon
Tea Oil CamelliaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
different intensities of stem/branch thinning and fertilizinge0
Outcome
profit margine0
Direction
increasede1
Value
US$ 2,426 ha-1 year-1e1
Qualifier
US$ 1,791e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by applying different intensities of stem/branch thinning and fertilizing to 29-year-old plantation, profit margin increased from US$ 502 to as much as US$ 549 ha-1 year-1 for growers selling dry seeds as final product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1589 · show in text ↑
e1

“it increased from US$ 1,791 to US$ 2,426 ha-1 year-1 by extracting oil for final product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tea Oil Camellia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · yield · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.