Paper · 1958 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Studies on the Photosynthesis of Sugar Beet Plants : (1) Changes in the photosynthetic ability under field condition

Eiji OSHIMA

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiments were carried out to investigate the photosynthetic activities of sugar beet plants. The results obtained are as follows: Each leaf of sugar beet plants had its own activity and the youngest matured leaf showed the highest activity. Photosynthetic amount per plant growing in the sugar beet plant community increased with enlargement of total leaf area but the amount did not increase at the same rate of enlargement of leaf area, then the ability decreased with reduction of total leaf area at maturing stage. Photosynthetic amount per 100 cm2 (leaf area) became lower in proportion to enlargement of total leaf area and showed the lowest amount at the maximum leaf area. Consequently it may be concluded that the leaves were shaded with each other and the light receiving coefficient became lower at the most flourishing stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The youngest mature sugar beet leaf had the highest photosynthetic activity.

Taxon
sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Organ / stage
youngest matured leafe0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each leaf of sugar beet plants had its own activity and the youngest matured leaf showed the highest activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–243 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant photosynthetic amount increased with total leaf area, but less rapidly than leaf area.

Taxon
sugar beet plantBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Organ / stage
total leaf areae0
Outcome
Photosynthetic amount per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
did not increase at the same rate of enlargement of leaf areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic amount per plant growing in the sugar beet plant community increased with enlargement of total leaf area but the amount did not increase at the same rate of enlargement of leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–440 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic ability decreased as leaf area declined at maturity.

Organ / stage
maturing stagee0
Outcome
abilitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ability decreased with reduction of total leaf area at maturing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic amount per unit leaf area decreased as total leaf area expanded and reached its minimum at maximum leaf area.

Organ / stage
total leaf areae0
Outcome
Photosynthetic amount per 100 cm2 (leaf area)e0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic amount per 100 cm2 (leaf area) became lower in proportion to enlargement of total leaf area and showed the lowest amount at the maximum leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed reduced light reception at peak canopy growth to mutual leaf shading.

Outcome
light receiving coefficiente0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
leaves were shaded with each othere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently it may be concluded that the leaves were shaded with each other and the light receiving coefficient became lower at the most flourishing stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑