Paper · 2003 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effects of water deficit during stage II of peach fruit development and postharvest on fruit quality and ethylene production

M. Gelly; I. Recasens; M. Mata; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
56
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThis study examined the hypothesis that enhancement of peach quality resulting from Regulated Deficit Irrigation (RDI) is caused primarily by changes in fruit physiology during development. Water deficit was applied during either stage II of fruit development (RDI-SII) or during stage II and postharvest (RDI-SII-PH), as compared with non-droughted (control) and postharvest (RDI-PH) treatments. Fruit from the various RDI treatments had significantly higher soluble solids concentrations and red colour at harvest than control fruit. While fruit respiration was not altered by any RDI treatment, ethylene production indicated sooner the onset of climacteric phase for fruit from RDI-SII and RDI-SII-PH than for control or RDI-PH fruit. Accordingly, greater ethylene production in detached fruit was related to their having experienced water stress during development. Ethylene production by RDI-PH fruit did not change, but their quality did in terms of increased soluble solids concentration and improved skin colour similar to the RDI-SII treatment. This observation suggests that water-stress related changes occurring during fruit development are not the only factors involved in enhancing quality in RDI fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from the RDI treatments had significantly higher soluble solids concentrations and red colour at harvest than control fruit.

Treatment
RDI treatmentse0
Outcome
soluble solids concentrations and red coloure0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at harveste0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from the various RDI treatments had significantly higher soluble solids concentrations and red colour at harvest than control fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit respiration was not altered by any RDI treatment.

Treatment
RDI treatmente0
Outcome
fruit respiratione0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit respiration was not altered by any RDI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene production indicated an earlier onset of the climacteric phase for fruit from RDI-SII and RDI-SII-PH than for control or RDI-PH fruit.

Treatment
RDI-SII and RDI-SII-PHe0
Outcome
onset of climacteric phasee0
Direction
soonere0
Comparator
control or RDI-PH fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethylene production indicated sooner the onset of climacteric phase for fruit from RDI-SII and RDI-SII-PH than for control or RDI-PH fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater ethylene production in detached fruit was related to having experienced water stress during development.

Organ / stage
detached fruite0
Treatment
water stress during developmente0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater ethylene production in detached fruit was related to their having experienced water stress during development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene production by RDI-PH fruit did not change.

Treatment
RDI-PHe0
Outcome
Ethylene productione0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene production by RDI-PH fruit did not change, but their quality did in terms of increased soluble solids concentration and improved skin colour similar to the RDI-SII treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI-PH fruit showed increased soluble solids concentration and improved skin colour, similar to the RDI-SII treatment.

Treatment
RDI-PHe0
Outcome
soluble solids concentration and improved skin coloure0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
similar to the RDI-SII treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene production by RDI-PH fruit did not change, but their quality did in terms of increased soluble solids concentration and improved skin colour similar to the RDI-SII treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that water-stress related changes during fruit development are not the only factors involved in enhancing quality in RDI fruit.

Treatment
water-stress related changes occurring during fruit developmente0
Outcome
enhancing qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-stress related changes occurring during fruit development are not the only factors involved in enhancing quality in RDI fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–67 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.