Paper · 2009

EFFECTS OF SOWING TIME, N AND P FERTILIZERS ON SEED YIELD, OIL AND PROTEIN PRODUCTION IN CANOLA

A Morshedi; H. Farahbakhsh

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is just a few years that canola (Brassica napus L.) is grown in Kerman Province, Iran, and little information is available on its response to nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) fertilizers. Therefore, a 2-yr field study as a split plot design was conducted at Shahid Zendehrooh Education Center in Kerman, investigating the influence of two sowing dates, early to late Oct. (main plots) and N and P fertilizers (sub-plots) in 3 replications. Canola was sown after barley and alfalfa in 1st and 2nd year of sowing respectively. In early Oct sowing of 1st yr, N and P fertilizers were applied at 300 and 50 kg ha -1 rates for a seed yield of 3.4 t ha -1 . Results indicated that in the 2nd year, alfalfa had enriched the soil with N; therefore, for a seed yield of 3.9 t ha -1 in early Oct. sowing, 200 kg N ha -1 was applied while 300 kg N ha -1 reduced the seed yield. Delaying sowing reduced total N concentration in young leaves while decreased seed, oil and protein production. It could be concluded that sowing date, fertilizers application according to soil test results and planting canola after a legume were factors affecting optimum canola yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early October sowing with 300 kg N and 50 kg P per hectare yielded 3.4 tonnes of seed per hectare in year one.

Organ / stage
seede0
Treatment
N and P fertilizers were applied at 300 and 50 kg ha -1 ratese0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
3.4 t ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“In early Oct sowing of 1st yr, N and P fertilizers were applied at 300 and 50 kg ha -1 rates for a seed yield of 3.4 t ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year two, early October sowing with 200 kg N per hectare yielded 3.9 tonnes per hectare.

Treatment
200 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
3.9 t ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“for a seed yield of 3.9 t ha -1 in early Oct. sowing, 200 kg N ha -1 was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 kg N per hectare rate reduced seed yield in the second year.

Treatment
300 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“while 300 kg N ha -1 reduced the seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing reduced total nitrogen concentration in young leaves.

Organ / stage
young leavese0
Treatment
Delaying sowinge0
Outcome
total N concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying sowing reduced total N concentration in young leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased seed production.

Treatment
Delaying sowinge0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying sowing reduced total N concentration in young leaves while decreased seed, oil and protein production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased oil production.

Treatment
Delaying sowinge0
Outcome
oile0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying sowing reduced total N concentration in young leaves while decreased seed, oil and protein production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased protein production.

Treatment
Delaying sowinge0
Outcome
protein productione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delaying sowing reduced total N concentration in young leaves while decreased seed, oil and protein production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–980 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that sowing time, soil-test-guided fertilizer, and preceding legume affect optimum yield.

Outcome
optimum canola yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing date, fertilizers application according to soil test results and planting canola after a legume were factors affecting optimum canola yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1155 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.