Paper · 1995 · Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C

Notes: Differential Alterations of Glutathione S-Transferase Enzyme Activities in Three Sorghum Varieties Following Viral Infection

Gabor Gullner; Tamás Kömives; Richard Gáborjányi

2
claims
7
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Activities of the enzyme glutathione S-transferase were determined in leaves of sorghum varieties of differential susceptibility to infection with sugarcane mosaic virus. Inoculation with the virus resulted in significant induction of the enzyme in the leaves of the immune host, while hitherto unpublished dramatic reductions were detected in the leaves of the systemic host sorghum varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus inoculation significantly induced glutathione S-transferase activity in leaves of the immune sorghum host.

Taxon
sorghum varietiesSorghume1
Material
immune hoste0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Inoculation with the viruse0
Interactor
sugarcane mosaic virusSugarcane mosaic viruse2pathogen
Outcome
glutathione S-transferasee1
Direction
inductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sugarcane mosaic virus
Sugarcane mosaic virus · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with the virus resulted in significant induction of the enzyme in the leaves of the immune host”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum varieties”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“glutathione S-transferase were determined in leaves of sorghum varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“infection with sugarcane mosaic virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus inoculation dramatically reduced glutathione S-transferase activity in leaves of systemic host sorghum varieties.

Taxon
sorghum varietiesSorghume0
Material
systemic host sorghum varietiese0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Inoculation with the viruse0
Interactor
sugarcane mosaic virusSugarcane mosaic viruse2pathogen
Outcome
glutathione S-transferasee1
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sugarcane mosaic virus
Sugarcane mosaic virus · InteractorJeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with the virus resulted in significant induction of the enzyme in the leaves of the immune host, while hitherto unpublished dramatic reductions were detected in the leaves of the systemic host sorghum varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“glutathione S-transferase were determined in leaves of sorghum varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“infection with sugarcane mosaic virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–169 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Sugarcane mosaic virus · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.