Paper · 2004

A STUDY ON SOURCE-SINK RELATIONSHIP OF WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER FAVOURABLE AND TERMINAL HEAT STRESS CONDITIONS IN KHUZESTAN

Radmehr Mohammad; Lotf Ali Ayeneh Gh.A.; A Naderi

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to determine, source of grain yield limitation under different enviromental conditions, as well as indentifying the rate of restrication caused by terminal heat stress on development and growth of wheat, this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications, in two separate experiments in two years(1998-2000). The experiments were sown in late of december and january to stimulate favoarable and unfavourable conditions, respectively. Five to seven days after anthesis flag leaf and spikelets from one side of spike were removed to stimulate, sink and source limitation respectively. Aftert harvest, source and sink restrication percentage were calculated according to the mean of remaining grains in treated spike and control (without removal of flag leaf and spikelets). Results indicated that all genotypes had not sink restrication and the contribution of flag leaf to grain dry weight was 12%. However, some genotypes showed source restrication. This restrication was estimated from 0 to 34% (mean: 12.6%) and 5.7 – 41.2% (mean:17.2%) for favourable and unfavourable conditions, respectively. Therfore, source restrication caused by exposure to terminal heat stress was greater by 6%. Likewise, results indicated that source restrication was higher in genotypes with large grain size. Grain weight had not significant effect in the determination of final yield. Reduction in grain yield must be sought in other yield components, such as grain number per spike and spikes number per sqaure meter. Key word: Restrication, Unfavourable condition, Favourable conditions, Source, Sink, Terminal heat stress. Study of salinity effect on growth and accumulation ions in promissing wheat (Triticum aestivum ) genotypes A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes. Further field experiments are necessary for confirmation and application of the result.In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes. Further field experiments are necessary for confirmation and application of the result.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Source restrication under favourable conditions was estimated at 0 to 34% (mean 12.6%) across wheat genotypes.

Treatment
favourablee1
Outcome
source restricatione1
Value
0 to 34% (mean: 12.6%)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–268 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, some genotypes showed source restrication. This restrication was estimated from 0 to 34% (mean: 12.6%) and 5.7 – 41.2% (mean:17.2%) for favourable and unfavourable conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Source restrication under unfavourable conditions was estimated at 5.7 to 41.2% (mean 17.2%) across wheat genotypes.

Treatment
unfavourablee1
Outcome
source restricatione1
Value
5.7 – 41.2% (mean:17.2%)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–268 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, some genotypes showed source restrication. This restrication was estimated from 0 to 34% (mean: 12.6%) and 5.7 – 41.2% (mean:17.2%) for favourable and unfavourable conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1179 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Source restrication was higher in wheat genotypes with large grain size.

Material
genotypes with large grain sizee3
Outcome
source restricatione3
Direction
highere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–268 · show in text ↑
e3

“Likewise, results indicated that source restrication was higher in genotypes with large grain size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Source restrication caused by exposure to terminal heat stress was greater by 6%.

Treatment
terminal heat stresse4
Outcome
source restricatione4
Direction
greatere4
Value
6%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–268 · show in text ↑
e4

“Therfore, source restrication caused by exposure to terminal heat stress was greater by 6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1271 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No genotype showed sink restrication after removal of spikelets.

Material
all genotypese5
Outcome
sink restricatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–268 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results indicated that all genotypes had not sink restrication and the contribution of flag leaf to grain dry weight was 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flag leaf contributed 12% to grain dry weight.

Organ / stage
flag leafe5
Outcome
contribution of flag leaf to grain dry weighte5
Value
12%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–268 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results indicated that all genotypes had not sink restrication and the contribution of flag leaf to grain dry weight was 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight had no significant effect on final yield in wheat.

Outcome
final yielde6
Qualifier
Grain weight had not significant effecte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this research was conducted with twenty wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–268 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain weight had not significant effect in the determination of final yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow showed less reduction in growth under salinity than the other wheat genotypes.

Material
Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bowe7
Treatment
salinitye7
Outcome
reduction in growthe7
Direction
lesse7
Comparator
the other genotypese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–2797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots under salinity.

Material
Pgo/Serie7
Treatment
salinitye7
Outcome
Na accumulation in shootse7
Direction
inhibitede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–2797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pgo/Seri absorbed less Cl under salinity.

Material
Pgo/Serie7
Treatment
salinitye7
Outcome
Cle7
Direction
absorbed lesse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–2797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots.

Material
Opata/Bowe7
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse7
Outcome
Na and Cle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–2797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tajan, Zagros and Rayon accumulated high Na and Cl, which increased the toxic effect of the ions.

Material
Tajan, Zagros and Rayone7
Outcome
Na and Cle7
Qualifier
increased toxic effect of the ionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–2797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opata/Bow had higher salt tolerance than the other wheat genotypes despite high Na and Cl accumulation.

Material
Opata/Bowe7
Treatment
salinitye7
Outcome
salt tolerancee7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
in spite of high Na and Cl accumulatione7
Comparator
the other genotypese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–2797 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Opata/Bow probably compartmented toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast, giving better osmotic adjustment.

Material
Opata/Bowe7
Outcome
osmotic adjustmente7
Qualifier
compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplaste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A. Abdolzadeh and N. Saffarie ABSTRACT In order to evaluate the tolerance level and identification of tolerance mechanism to salinity, response of five genotypes of wheat (Zagros, Tajan, Opata/Bow, Pgo/Seri and Rayon ) to six salt treatments including 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mM NaCl was studied in hydroponic culture in growth chamber under control condition. Pgo/Seri and Opata/Bow in comparison to the other genotypes, showed less reduction in growth under salinity. Pgo/Seri inhibited high Na accumulation in shoots and absorbed less Cl. Opata/Bow accumulated high Na and Cl in shoots and roots which probably were compartmented these toxic ions in the vacuole or apoplast to result a better osmotic adjustment and less toxicity of the ions. Tajan, Zagros and Rayon also accumulated high level of Na and Cl that increased toxic effect of the ions. Results also indicated that Opata/Bow, in spite of high Na and Cl accumulation, had higher salt tolerance in comparison to the other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–2797 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 19 positive, 66 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.