Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN APPLES

K.D. Aggelopoulou; G.D. Nanos; T.A. Gemtos

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this work was to study the spatial and temporal variability of yield and fruit quality in an apple (Malus × domestica) orchard for three consecutive years. The orchard was located in Ptolemaida area, northern Greece and two cultivars were studied, 'Red Chief and 'Fuji'. For yield mapping, fruit production per five trees was weighed and geographical position in the middle of the five trees was recorded using a palm-top computer with GPS. Fruit samples were randomly selected from each yield measuring point and fruit quality was measured immediately and after 4 months cold storage at 0°C. Fruit quality included fruit mass, skin colour, flesh firmness, juice soluble solids content, pH and acidity. Yield and quality characteristics maps were generated using Surfer software. Significant spatial variability in yield and quality were found. Spatial variability for quality was lower than the one for yield. Fruit soluble solids content and flesh firmness showed low and fruit mass, acidity and skin colour showed high spatial variability. Temporal variability (differences from year to year) in yield was low in 'Red Chief and high in 'Fuji' trees due to alternate bearing. Temporal variability was significant for quality characteristics, probably due to differences in weather conditions from year to year. During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and quality had significant spatial variability.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Outcome
spatial variability in yield and qualitye0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant spatial variability in yield and quality were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality varied less spatially than yield.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Outcome
Spatial variability for qualitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
yielde0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spatial variability for quality was lower than the one for yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–926 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids content and flesh firmness had low spatial variability.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Outcome
Fruit soluble solids content and flesh firmnesse0
Direction
lowe0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit soluble solids content and flesh firmness showed low and fruit mass, acidity and skin colour showed high spatial variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1058 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit mass, acidity and skin colour had high spatial variability.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Outcome
fruit mass, acidity and skin coloure0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit mass, acidity and skin colour showed high spatial variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1058 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year-to-year yield variability was low in Red Chief.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Material
Red Chiefe0
Outcome
Temporal variability (differences from year to year) in yielde0
Direction
lowe0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Temporal variability (differences from year to year) in yield was low in 'Red Chief and high in 'Fuji' trees due to alternate bearing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year-to-year yield variability was high in Fuji due to alternate bearing.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Material
Fujie0
Outcome
Temporal variability (differences from year to year) in yielde0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
due to alternate bearinge0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Temporal variability (differences from year to year) in yield was low in 'Red Chief and high in 'Fuji' trees due to alternate bearing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality characteristics varied significantly across years.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Outcome
Temporal variability was significant for quality characteristicse0
Qualifier
probably due to differences in weather conditions from year to yeare0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Temporal variability was significant for quality characteristics, probably due to differences in weather conditions from year to year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage reduced flesh firmness and acidity.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
flesh firmness and aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage raised soluble solids content in Red Chief.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Material
Red Chiefe0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
soluble solids contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage did not change soluble solids content in Fuji.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Material
Fujie0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
soluble solids contente0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.