Paper · 2006 · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)

Interference and control of sharppod morningglory (Ipomoea cordatotriloba dennstedt) in glyphosate-resistant cotton.

GREGORY L. STEELE

18
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sharppod morningglory is a perennial vine commonly found infesting croplands in Texas and the southeastern United States. Previous research regarding morningglory competition and control primarily focused on annual Ipomoea. Interference, control, and herbicide translocation of sharppod morningglory could differ from that of other morningglories because of differences in growth and resource allocation. Therefore, field and laboratory experiments were conducted from 2001 to 2004 to: 1) determine the effects of seed-propagated and root-sprouted sharppod morningglory on cotton economic value, yield, harvest efficiency, and fiber quality; 2) evaluate sharppod morningglory control with cotton herbicides, and determine the effect of diuron rates on glyphosate absorption and translocation; and 3) assess the impact of cotton herbicide program and cotton-corn rotation on weed species composition over three years. A relatively large proportion of sharppod morningglory biomass was accumulated belowground during the first 8 wk of growth in the greenhouse. Consequently, up to 6 plants 10-m row-1 did not significantly reduce cotton lint yield. Sharppod morningglory density impacted color grade more than any other classification parameter. Through combined effects on yield and quality, cotton lint value was reduced by approximately 85% in the presence of 8 sharppod morningglory 10 m-1. Glyphosate alone did not completely control sharppod morningglory. The use of glufosinate, bromoxynil, or a combination of glyphosate plus diuron provided acceptable control. Sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate when applied alone, but most glyphosate was retained in treated leaves and did not translocate well. Diuron decreased absorption, increased leaf retention, and inhibited glyphosate translocation to roots. Rotation to corn and the use of preemergence herbicides in cotton improved control of grass and broadleaf weeds during the year of treatment. In the season following the 3-yr rotation, there were no lasting effects of crop rotation on density or control of grasses and broadleaves. However, hand-hoed and herbicide treated plots resulted in weed densities 2- to 3-fold lower than the untreated. Preemergence herbicides and/or crop rotation can reduce weed density and improve weed control, but these strategies must be employed long-term to reduce density of problematic weeds through depletion of the soil seedbank.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sharppod morningglory accumulated much biomass belowground during its first eight weeks.

Taxon
sharppod morningglorye0
Outcome
biomass was accumulated belowgrounde0
Setting
greenhousee0

Verbatim

e0

“A relatively large proportion of sharppod morningglory biomass was accumulated belowground during the first 8 wk of growth in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1057 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to six sharppod morningglory plants per 10-m row did not significantly reduce cotton lint yield.

Interactor
sharppod morningglorye1weed
Outcome
cotton lint yielde0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0
Value
6 plants 10-m row-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up to 6 plants 10-m row-1 did not significantly reduce cotton lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“sharppod morningglory on cotton economic value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sharppod morningglory density affected cotton color grade more than other classification parameters.

Interactor
Sharppod morningglorye0weed
Outcome
color gradee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sharppod morningglory density impacted color grade more than any other classification parameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight sharppod morningglory plants per 10 m reduced cotton lint value about 85%.

Interactor
sharppod morningglorye0weed
Outcome
cotton lint valuee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 85%e0
Qualifier
8 sharppod morningglory 10 m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton lint value was reduced by approximately 85% in the presence of 8 sharppod morningglory 10 m-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate alone did not completely control sharppod morningglory.

Taxon
sharppod morningglorye0
Treatment
Glyphosate alonee0
Outcome
control sharppod morningglorye0
Direction
did not completely controle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate alone did not completely control sharppod morningglory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate provided acceptable sharppod morningglory control.

Taxon
sharppod morningglorye1
Treatment
glufosinatee0
Outcome
acceptable controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The use of glufosinate, bromoxynil, or a combination of glyphosate plus diuron provided acceptable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1566 · show in text ↑
e1

“sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1568–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromoxynil provided acceptable sharppod morningglory control.

Taxon
sharppod morningglorye1
Treatment
bromoxynile0
Outcome
acceptable controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The use of glufosinate, bromoxynil, or a combination of glyphosate plus diuron provided acceptable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1566 · show in text ↑
e1

“sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1568–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus diuron provided acceptable sharppod morningglory control.

Taxon
sharppod morningglorye1
Treatment
glyphosate plus diurone0
Outcome
acceptable controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The use of glufosinate, bromoxynil, or a combination of glyphosate plus diuron provided acceptable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1566 · show in text ↑
e1

“sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1568–1622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate applied alone, but most stayed in treated leaves.

Taxon
Sharppod morningglorye0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
absorbede0
Value
75%e0
Qualifier
retained in treated leaves and did not translocate welle0

Verbatim

e0

“Sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate when applied alone, but most glyphosate was retained in treated leaves and did not translocate well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron decreased glyphosate absorption in sharppod morningglory.

Taxon
Sharppod morningglorye1
Treatment
Diurone0
Outcome
absorptione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Diuron decreased absorption, increased leaf retention, and inhibited glyphosate translocation to roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1826 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron increased glyphosate retention in leaves of sharppod morningglory.

Taxon
Sharppod morningglorye1
Treatment
Diurone0
Outcome
leaf retentione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Diuron decreased absorption, increased leaf retention, and inhibited glyphosate translocation to roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1826 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron inhibited glyphosate movement to sharppod morningglory roots.

Taxon
Sharppod morningglorye1
Treatment
Diurone0
Outcome
glyphosate translocation to rootse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Diuron decreased absorption, increased leaf retention, and inhibited glyphosate translocation to roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1826 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sharppod morningglory absorbed up to 75% of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation to corn improved grass and broadleaf weed control during treatment.

Treatment
Rotation to corne0
Outcome
control of grass and broadleaf weedse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotation to corn and the use of preemergence herbicides in cotton improved control of grass and broadleaf weeds during the year of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence herbicides improved grass and broadleaf weed control in cotton during treatment.

Treatment
preemergence herbicidese0
Outcome
control of grass and broadleaf weedse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotation to corn and the use of preemergence herbicides in cotton improved control of grass and broadleaf weeds during the year of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation had no lasting effect on weed density or control in the following season.

Treatment
crop rotatione0
Outcome
density or control of grasses and broadleavese0
Direction
no lasting effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no lasting effects of crop rotation on density or control of grasses and broadleaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2013–2108 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton-corn rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-hoed plots had weed densities two to threefold lower than untreated plots.

Treatment
hand-hoede0
Outcome
weed densitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2- to 3-folde0
Comparator
untreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-hoed and herbicide treated plots resulted in weed densities 2- to 3-fold lower than the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2221 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide-treated plots had weed densities two to threefold lower than untreated plots.

Treatment
herbicide treatede0
Outcome
weed densitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2- to 3-folde0
Comparator
untreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-hoed and herbicide treated plots resulted in weed densities 2- to 3-fold lower than the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2221 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend long-term preemergence herbicides or crop rotation to deplete weed seedbanks.

Outcome
these strategies must be employed long-terme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preemergence herbicides and/or crop rotation can reduce weed density and improve weed control, but these strategies must be employed long-term to reduce density of problematic weeds through depletion of the soil seedbank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2223–2443 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

rotation · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 100 positive, 8 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.