Abstract
A greenhouse experiment was conducted with three different levels and type of growing media (soil: vermicompost: sand; 2: 1: 1, 1: 2: 1 and vermicompost: sand, 2: 1) alongwith two bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and phosphate solubilizing bacteria) in factorial randomized block design with three replications to standardize agro-technique for tomato production under protected conditions. Out of different treatment combinations, soilless growing media comprising of vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobacter recorded the highest number of fruits per plant (58.95 & 54.00), average fruit weight (84.89 & 81.56 g), fruit yield per plant (5.01 and 4.40 kg), total soluble solids (5.18° & 5.21°B), ascorbic acid (36.45 & 33.88 mg per 100 g) and lycopene content mg per 100 g (5.21 & 5.22 mg per 100 g) during both the years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost–sand medium with Azotobacter seedling treatment gave the highest tomato fruit number per plant in both years.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- number of fruits per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 58.95 & 54.00e0
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato”
e0“soilless growing media comprising of vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobacter recorded the highest number of fruits per plant (58.95 & 54.00)”
e1“Out of different treatment combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
The same combination gave the highest average tomato fruit weight in both years.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- average fruit weighte0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 84.89 & 81.56 ge0
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato”
e0“average fruit weight (84.89 & 81.56 g)”
e1“Out of different treatment combinations, soilless growing media comprising of vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobacter recorded the highest number of fruits per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
The same combination gave the highest tomato fruit yield per plant in both years.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- fruit yield per plante0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 5.01 and 4.40 kge0
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato”
e0“fruit yield per plant (5.01 and 4.40 kg)”
e1“Out of different treatment combinations, soilless growing media comprising of vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobacter recorded the highest number of fruits per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
The same combination gave the highest tomato total soluble solids in both years.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- total soluble solidse0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 5.18° & 5.21°Be0
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato”
e0“total soluble solids (5.18° & 5.21°B)”
e1“Out of different treatment combinations, soilless growing media comprising of vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobacter recorded the highest number of fruits per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
The same combination gave the highest tomato ascorbic acid in both years.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- ascorbic acide0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 36.45 & 33.88 mg per 100 ge0
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato”
e0“ascorbic acid (36.45 & 33.88 mg per 100 g)”
e1“Out of different treatment combinations, soilless growing media comprising of vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobacter recorded the highest number of fruits per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
The same combination gave the highest tomato lycopene content in both years.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- lycopene contente0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 5.21 & 5.22 mg per 100 ge0
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomato”
e0“lycopene content mg per 100 g (5.21 & 5.22 mg per 100 g)”
e1“Out of different treatment combinations, soilless growing media comprising of vermicompost: sand; 2: 1 alongwith seedling treatment with Azotobacter recorded the highest number of fruits per plant”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Azotobacter · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →growing medium · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →growing medium · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
137 papers more in this group
See all 141 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
167 papers more in this group
See all 171 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.