Abstract
The experiment was planned to determine the most effective leaf-applied plant growth regulators (PGRs) for the optimum performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars and to select the most promising cultivar. The PGRs viz., indole-3acetic acid, gibberellic acid, kinetin, salicylic acid and triacontanol and the cultivars, DCP 92-3, GNG-469, KWR-108 and local (H1). Biochemical characteristics like carbonic anhydrase activity (CA), nitrate reductase (NR) activity, yield parameters viz., number of pods per plant, seed number per pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield per plant, and quality attributes i.e., seed protein content were affected by all foliar PGRs but most promising with GA. On one hand, among the cultivars, DCP 923 gave the maximum seed yield which was 60% higher over local. Similarly, on other hand, among the PGRs, GA produces the 175% higher seed yield than water-sprayed control (Fw). The interaction treatment was found non-signifcant for most of the parameter mentioned above.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar PGRs affected chickpea carbonic anhydrase and nitrate reductase activities, with GA most promising.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- foliar PGRse0
- Gene
- carbonic anhydrasee0
- Outcome
- carbonic anhydrase activity (CA), nitrate reductase (NR) activitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Biochemical characteristics like carbonic anhydrase activity (CA), nitrate reductase (NR) activity, yield parameters viz., number of pods per plant, seed number per pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield per plant, and quality attributes i.e., seed protein content were affected by all foliar PGRs but most promising with GA.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar PGRs affected chickpea pod number, seed number, 100-seed weight and seed yield, with GA most promising.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar PGRse0
- Outcome
- number of pods per plant, seed number per pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield per plante0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield parameters viz., number of pods per plant, seed number per pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield per plant, and quality attributes i.e., seed protein content were affected by all foliar PGRs but most promising with GA.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar PGRs affected chickpea seed protein content, with GA most promising.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar PGRse0
- Outcome
- seed protein contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed protein content were affected by all foliar PGRs but most promising with GA.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
DCP 923 seed yield was 60% higher than the local chickpea cultivar.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- DCP 923e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 60%e0
- Comparator
- locale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“among the cultivars, DCP 923 gave the maximum seed yield which was 60% higher over local.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
GA produced 175% higher chickpea seed yield than water-sprayed control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- GAe0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 175%e0
- Comparator
- water-sprayed control (Fw)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA produces the 175% higher seed yield than water-sprayed control (Fw).”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The cultivar by PGR interaction was nonsignificant for most measured parameters.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- interaction treatmente0
- Outcome
- interaction treatmente0
- Qualifier
- most of the parameter mentioned abovee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction treatment was found non-signifcant for most of the parameter mentioned above.”
t0“chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →class · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
class · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
class · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.