Paper · 2004 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Integrated nutrient management for sustainable cabbage-tomato cropping sequence under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Pardeep Kumar; Santosh Kumar Sharma

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Different integrated nutrient application strategies were applied in cabbage-tomato sequence under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. The treatments FYM 10t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 90:90:45 kg/ha NPK) in cabbage and FYM 25t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 150:112.5:82.5 kg/ha NPK) in tomato were found best for obtaining higher values for growth, yield and available nutrients (NPK kg/ha) in both the crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM 10t/ha with 150% NPK gave the best growth and yield values in cabbage.

Treatment
FYM 10t/ha + 150% NPKe0
Outcome
growth, yielde0
Direction
higher valuese0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments FYM 10t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 90:90:45 kg/ha NPK) in cabbage and FYM 25t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 150:112.5:82.5 kg/ha NPK) in tomato were found best for obtaining higher values for growth, yield and available nutrients (NPK kg/ha) in both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM 25t/ha with 150% NPK gave the best growth and yield values in tomato.

Treatment
FYM 25t/ha + 150% NPKe0
Outcome
growth, yielde0
Direction
higher valuese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments FYM 10t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 90:90:45 kg/ha NPK) in cabbage and FYM 25t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 150:112.5:82.5 kg/ha NPK) in tomato were found best for obtaining higher values for growth, yield and available nutrients (NPK kg/ha) in both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported nutrient strategies gave higher available nutrients in the cabbage–tomato sequence.

Outcome
available nutrients (NPK kg/ha)e0
Direction
higher valuese0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments FYM 10t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 90:90:45 kg/ha NPK) in cabbage and FYM 25t/ha + 150% NPK (i.e. 150:112.5:82.5 kg/ha NPK) in tomato were found best for obtaining higher values for growth, yield and available nutrients (NPK kg/ha) in both the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–398 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.