Abstract
During kharif 1978, rice hispa, Dicladispa (Hispa) armigera Oliv. infested severely about 50 acres of paddy crop arouna Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. In a field experiment against ths adult hispa beetles twelve commercially formulated insecticides, formothion 25 EC, quinalphos 25 EC and 1.5% dust, monocrotophos 40 EC, phosphamidon 100 EC. phosalone 35 EC and 4% dust, methyl demeton 25 EC dimethoate 30 EC, methyl parathion 2% dust BHC 10% dust and DDT 5% dust were tested. The emulsified concentrates were tested at 004% @ 450 1/ha and dusts @ 20 kg/ha. Two insecticidal applications were given — first on 5th September and second on 13th September, 1978 All insecticidal treatments were found significantly superior to control. Among all insrcticidal treatments, quinalphos (both dust and EC), phosalone (both dust and EC), methyl parathion (dust) and monocrotophos (EC), were found most effective and at par in controlling the adult hispa beetles and prevented the pest multiplication upto three weeks. Maximum grain yield was recorded in quinalphos (dust) (16.90 q/ha), followed by quinalphos (EC) (16 48 q/ha). Considering the net profit/ha, quinalphos (EC) gave the maximum profit of Rs. 628.26 followed by quinalphos (dust), monocrotophos (EC) and phosalone (EC), which gave profit of Rs. 608.10, 606.90 and 509.90, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
All insecticidal treatments were significantly superior to the control against adult rice hispa.
- Taxon
- paddyt0
- Treatment
- insecticidal treatmentse1
- Outcome
- superior to controle1
- Direction
- significantly superiore1
- Comparator
- controle1
%2C_Ede%2C_the_Netherlands.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
HispaOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
%2C_Ede%2C_the_Netherlands.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“rice hispa, Dicladispa (Hispa) armigera Oliv. infested severely about 50 acres of paddy crop”
e1“All insecticidal treatments were found significantly superior to control”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos (both dust and EC) was most effective in controlling adult hispa beetles and prevented pest multiplication for up to three weeks.
- Taxon
- paddyt0
- Treatment
- quinalphos (both dust and EC)e2
- Outcome
- controlling the adult hispa beetlese2
- Direction
- most effectivee2
- Qualifier
- prevented the pest multiplication upto three weekse2
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice hispa, Dicladispa (Hispa) armigera Oliv. infested severely about 50 acres of paddy crop”
e1“All insecticidal treatments were found significantly superior to control”
e2“quinalphos (both dust and EC), phosalone (both dust and EC), methyl parathion (dust) and monocrotophos (EC), were found most effective and at par in controlling the adult hispa beetles and prevented the pest multiplication upto three weeks”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosalone (both dust and EC) was most effective in controlling adult hispa beetles and prevented pest multiplication for up to three weeks.
- Taxon
- paddyt0
- Treatment
- phosalone (both dust and EC)e2
- Outcome
- controlling the adult hispa beetlese2
- Direction
- most effectivee2
- Qualifier
- prevented the pest multiplication upto three weekse2
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice hispa, Dicladispa (Hispa) armigera Oliv. infested severely about 50 acres of paddy crop”
e1“All insecticidal treatments were found significantly superior to control”
e2“quinalphos (both dust and EC), phosalone (both dust and EC), methyl parathion (dust) and monocrotophos (EC), were found most effective and at par in controlling the adult hispa beetles and prevented the pest multiplication upto three weeks”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Methyl parathion (dust) was most effective in controlling adult hispa beetles.
- Taxon
- paddyt0
- Treatment
- methyl parathion (dust)e2
- Outcome
- controlling the adult hispa beetlese2
- Direction
- most effectivee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice hispa, Dicladispa (Hispa) armigera Oliv. infested severely about 50 acres of paddy crop”
e2“quinalphos (both dust and EC), phosalone (both dust and EC), methyl parathion (dust) and monocrotophos (EC), were found most effective and at par in controlling the adult hispa beetles and prevented the pest multiplication upto three weeks”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Monocrotophos (EC) was most effective in controlling adult hispa beetles.
- Taxon
- paddyt0
- Treatment
- monocrotophos (EC)e2
- Outcome
- controlling the adult hispa beetlese2
- Direction
- most effectivee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rice hispa, Dicladispa (Hispa) armigera Oliv. infested severely about 50 acres of paddy crop”
e2“quinalphos (both dust and EC), phosalone (both dust and EC), methyl parathion (dust) and monocrotophos (EC), were found most effective and at par in controlling the adult hispa beetles and prevented the pest multiplication upto three weeks”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos (dust) gave the maximum grain yield, 16.90 q/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“Maximum grain yield was recorded in quinalphos (dust) (16.90 q/ha)”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos (EC) gave grain yield of 16 48 q/ha, followed by quinalphos (dust).
Verbatim
e3“Maximum grain yield was recorded in quinalphos (dust) (16.90 q/ha)”
e4“followed by quinalphos (EC) (16 48 q/ha)”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos (EC) gave the maximum net profit of Rs. 628.26 per ha.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e5“Considering the net profit/ha, quinalphos (EC) gave the maximum profit of Rs. 628.26”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos (dust) gave a profit of Rs. 608.10 per ha.
Verbatim
e6“followed by quinalphos (dust), monocrotophos (EC) and phosalone (EC), which gave profit of Rs. 608.10, 606.90 and 509.90, respectively”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Monocrotophos (EC) gave a profit of Rs. 606.90 per ha.
Verbatim
e6“followed by quinalphos (dust), monocrotophos (EC) and phosalone (EC), which gave profit of Rs. 608.10, 606.90 and 509.90, respectively”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosalone (EC) gave a profit of Rs. 509.90 per ha.
Verbatim
e6“followed by quinalphos (dust), monocrotophos (EC) and phosalone (EC), which gave profit of Rs. 608.10, 606.90 and 509.90, respectively”
t0“Field Efficacy and Economics of Some Insecticides Against Dicladispa Armigera on Paddy”
The same questions in other papers
quinalphos · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.