Paper · 1995 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Management of fusarial wilt of banana with organic amendments

Adhimoolam Karthikeyan; M. N. Alagianagalingam

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Application of neem cake at 250 kg/ha was highly effective in controlling the fusarial wilt disease of banana followed by the application of decomposed coir pith at 25 t/ha. The organic amendments mahua cake and farm yard manure were also found effective. The yield of banana was increased due to the application of these organic amendments by reducing the disease intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake at 250 kg/ha was highly effective against banana fusarial wilt.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
neem cake at 250 kg/hae0
Interactor
fusariale0pathogen
Outcome
fusarial wilt diseasee0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of neem cake at 250 kg/ha was highly effective in controlling the fusarial wilt disease of banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposed coir pith at 25 t/ha ranked after neem cake for wilt control.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
decomposed coir pith at 25 t/hae0
Interactor
fusariale0pathogen
Outcome
fusarial wilt diseasee0
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
neem cake at 250 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of neem cake at 250 kg/ha was highly effective in controlling the fusarial wilt disease of banana followed by the application of decomposed coir pith at 25 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

mahua cake was effective against banana fusarial wilt.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
mahua cakee0
Interactor
fusarialt0pathogen
Outcome
fusarial wiltt0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fusarial wilt of banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The organic amendments mahua cake and farm yard manure were also found effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

farm yard manure was effective against banana fusarial wilt.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
farm yard manuree0
Interactor
fusarialt0pathogen
Outcome
fusarial wiltt0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fusarial wilt of banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The organic amendments mahua cake and farm yard manure were also found effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–255 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments increased banana yield by reducing disease intensity.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Interactor
fusarialt0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
reducing the disease intensitye0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of banana was increased due to the application of these organic amendments by reducing the disease intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“fusarial wilt of banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–37 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

growing medium · disease · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · disease · MusaResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.