Paper · 2006 · Agricultural science digest

Integrated weed management in drum seeded rice

S. Porpavai; S. Anbumani; T. Jayaraj

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during the Samba season of 2002–03. Seven weed control treatments were tested in randomized block design with three replications. The yield attributes and grain yield were significantly increased by the weed control treatments. Pre emergence application of pretilachlor + safener + conoweeding + hand weeding followed by hand weeding twice recorded higher grain yield of 5.83 and 5.69 t/ha respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control significantly increased rice yield attributes and grain yield.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes and grain yield were significantly increased by the weed control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–258 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor, conoweeding and hand weeding produced 5.83 t/ha grain yield.

Treatment
Pre emergence application of pretilachlor + safener + conoweeding + hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.83e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre emergence application of pretilachlor + safener + conoweeding + hand weeding followed by hand weeding twice recorded higher grain yield of 5.83 and 5.69 t/ha respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding produced 5.69 t/ha grain yield.

Treatment
hand weeding twicee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.69 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre emergence application of pretilachlor + safener + conoweeding + hand weeding followed by hand weeding twice recorded higher grain yield of 5.83 and 5.69 t/ha respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.