Paper · 1989 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Nitrogen Concentration and Photosynthetic Photon Flux in Greenhouse Tomato Production: I. Growth and Development

Régis Larouche; André Gosselin; Louis-Philippe Vézina

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Tomato plants ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Vedettos) were grown in growth chambers under two photosynthetic photon flux (PPF; 125 and 250 μmol·s −1 ·m −2 , high-pressure sodium lamps) conditions for 18 hr and four N fertilization regimes (5, 10, 15, and 20 meq·liter −1 ) to characterize the ratio of vegetative to reproductive growth. At the lower PPF, vegetative growth was limited and did not respond to N increments in the nutrient solution. At 125 μmol·s −1 ·m −2 , maximum yields were obtained at the lowest N fertilization level. At 250 μmol·s −1 ·m −2 , maximum leaf dry weight and yields were obtained at intermediate N fertilization levels (10 and 15 meq·liter −1 ). Light levels did not alter the nitrate content of stem sap (but high PPF resulted in nitrate accumulation in leaves) but, at low PPF, nitrate accumulated in leaves at 20 meq N/liter. Nitrate in stem sap varied only slightly with N increments in the nutrient solution. The ratio of fruit fresh weight to leaf fresh weight decreased as N increased in the nutrient solution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At lower PPF, vegetative growth was limited and did not respond to nitrogen increments.

Treatment
N incrementse0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
did not responde0
Qualifier
lower PPFe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lower PPF, vegetative growth was limited and did not respond to N increments in the nutrient solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125 PPF, yield was maximal at the lowest nitrogen level.

Treatment
lowest N fertilization levele0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
125 μmol·s −1 ·m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 125 μmol·s −1 ·m −2 , maximum yields were obtained at the lowest N fertilization level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 PPF, leaf dry weight was maximal at intermediate nitrogen levels.

Treatment
intermediate N fertilization levels (10 and 15 meq·liter −1 )e0
Outcome
leaf dry weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 250 μmol·s −1 ·m −2 , maximum leaf dry weight and yields were obtained at intermediate N fertilization levels (10 and 15 meq·liter −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 PPF, yield was maximal at intermediate nitrogen levels.

Treatment
intermediate N fertilization levels (10 and 15 meq·liter −1 )e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 250 μmol·s −1 ·m −2 , maximum leaf dry weight and yields were obtained at intermediate N fertilization levels (10 and 15 meq·liter −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light level did not alter stem sap nitrate content.

Treatment
Light levelse0
Outcome
nitrate content of stem sape0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light levels did not alter the nitrate content of stem sap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High PPF caused leaf nitrate accumulation.

Treatment
high PPFe0
Outcome
nitrate accumulation in leavese0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high PPF resulted in nitrate accumulation in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low PPF, leaf nitrate accumulated at 20 meq N/liter.

Treatment
20 meq N/litere0
Outcome
nitrate accumulated in leavese0
Direction
accumulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at low PPF, nitrate accumulated in leaves at 20 meq N/liter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem sap nitrate varied only slightly with nitrogen increments.

Treatment
N incrementse0
Outcome
Nitrate in stem sape0
Qualifier
only slightlye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate in stem sap varied only slightly with N increments in the nutrient solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fruit to leaf fresh weight ratio declined as nutrient solution nitrogen increased.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
ratio of fruit fresh weight to leaf fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of fruit fresh weight to leaf fresh weight decreased as N increased in the nutrient solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑

light · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 19 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.