Paper · 2007 · Indian journal of plant protection

Influence of Organic Nutrient Sources on Insect Pests and Economics of Rice Production in India

R. Mahender Kumar; Ch. Padmavathi; K. Surekha; et al.

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

System of Rice Intensification (SRI) method of rice cultivation is being widely accepted among farmers in India in recent times due to the healthy plant growth and resistance to pests and diseases. An attempt was made in the present study to assess the insect pest scenario in SRI and conventional method of rice cultivation. Field experiments were conducted in Rabi 2006 at Directorate of Rice Research, Ramachandrapuram farm in sandy clay loam soil in split-plot design with cultivars as main plots (MTU 1010, Shanti & DRRH2 in Rabi) and three methods of crop husbandry (SRI, Eco-SRI and Conventional) as sub-plot treatments in four replications. Five insect pests viz., whorl maggot, hispa, yellow stem borer, leaf folder and green leaf hoppers were observed at different stages of crop growth period. Maximum per cent white ear heads were observed in SRI (12.5%) followed by conventional (8.9%) and ECOSRI (6.2%). Out of three varieties, Shanti had maximum per cent white ear heads (21.11%). Lowest per cent white ear heads were recorded in both DRRH2 (3.8%) and MTU1010 (2.8%). Among the organic sources, GM/GLM recorded higher B: C ratio than its combinations or vermicompost application as compared to inorganic fertilizer application under irrigated rice across locations. By considering higher price for organically grown rice as 1½ times to ordinary rice, the benefit cost ratio of the treatments GM/GLM, GM/GLM + FYM, GM/GLM + FYM + BGA, GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactor, GM/GLM + PSB were higher than the recommended fertilizer dose or neem cake or vermicompost application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five insect pests were observed in rice growth stages.

Interactor
whorl maggote0pest
Outcome
insect pestse0
Value
Fivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five insect pests viz., whorl maggot, hispa, yellow stem borer, leaf folder and green leaf hoppers were observed at different stages of crop growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had 12.5% white ear heads.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
per cent white ear headse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
12.5%e0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum per cent white ear heads were observed in SRI (12.5%) followed by conventional (8.9%) and ECOSRI (6.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

conventional had 8.9% white ear heads.

Treatment
conventionale0
Outcome
per cent white ear headse0
Value
8.9%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum per cent white ear heads were observed in SRI (12.5%) followed by conventional (8.9%) and ECOSRI (6.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ECOSRI had 6.2% white ear heads.

Treatment
ECOSRIe0
Outcome
per cent white ear headse0
Value
6.2%e0
Comparator
conventionale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum per cent white ear heads were observed in SRI (12.5%) followed by conventional (8.9%) and ECOSRI (6.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shanti had 21.11% white ear heads.

Material
Shantie0
Outcome
per cent white ear headse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
21.11%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shanti had maximum per cent white ear heads (21.11%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DRRH2 had 3.8% white ear heads.

Material
DRRH2e0
Outcome
per cent white ear headse0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
3.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lowest per cent white ear heads were recorded in both DRRH2 (3.8%) and MTU1010 (2.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MTU1010 had 2.8% white ear heads.

Material
MTU1010e0
Outcome
per cent white ear headse0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
2.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lowest per cent white ear heads were recorded in both DRRH2 (3.8%) and MTU1010 (2.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM/GLM had a higher benefit cost ratio than its combinations, vermicompost, or inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
GM/GLMe0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GM/GLM recorded higher B: C ratio than its combinations or vermicompost application as compared to inorganic fertilizer application under irrigated rice across locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1279 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM/GLM had higher benefit cost ratio under a premium organic rice price.

Treatment
GM/GLMe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1½ times to ordinary ricee0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By considering higher price for organically grown rice as 1½ times to ordinary rice, the benefit cost ratio of the treatments GM/GLM, GM/GLM + FYM, GM/GLM + FYM + BGA, GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactor, GM/GLM + PSB were higher than the recommended fertilizer dose or neem cake or vermicompost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM/GLM + FYM had higher benefit cost ratio under a premium organic rice price.

Treatment
GM/GLM + FYMe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1½ times to ordinary ricee0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By considering higher price for organically grown rice as 1½ times to ordinary rice, the benefit cost ratio of the treatments GM/GLM, GM/GLM + FYM, GM/GLM + FYM + BGA, GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactor, GM/GLM + PSB were higher than the recommended fertilizer dose or neem cake or vermicompost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM/GLM + FYM + BGA had higher benefit cost ratio under a premium organic rice price.

Treatment
GM/GLM + FYM + BGAe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1½ times to ordinary ricee0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By considering higher price for organically grown rice as 1½ times to ordinary rice, the benefit cost ratio of the treatments GM/GLM, GM/GLM + FYM, GM/GLM + FYM + BGA, GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactor, GM/GLM + PSB were higher than the recommended fertilizer dose or neem cake or vermicompost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactor had higher benefit cost ratio under a premium organic rice price.

Treatment
GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactore0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1½ times to ordinary ricee0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By considering higher price for organically grown rice as 1½ times to ordinary rice, the benefit cost ratio of the treatments GM/GLM, GM/GLM + FYM, GM/GLM + FYM + BGA, GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactor, GM/GLM + PSB were higher than the recommended fertilizer dose or neem cake or vermicompost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM/GLM + PSB had higher benefit cost ratio under a premium organic rice price.

Treatment
GM/GLM + PSBe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1½ times to ordinary ricee0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By considering higher price for organically grown rice as 1½ times to ordinary rice, the benefit cost ratio of the treatments GM/GLM, GM/GLM + FYM, GM/GLM + FYM + BGA, GM/GLM + BGA + Azotobactor, GM/GLM + PSB were higher than the recommended fertilizer dose or neem cake or vermicompost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1579 · show in text ↑

irrigation · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.