Paper · 2016 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of Deficit Irrigation on Yield and Quality of Onion Crop

David K. Rop; Emmanuel C. Kipkorir; John K. Taragon

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The broad objective of this study was to test Deficit Irrigation (DI) as an appropriate irrigation management strategy to improve crop water productivity and give optimum onion crop yield. A field trial was conducted with drip irrigation system of six irrigation treatments replicated three times in a randomized complete block design. The crop was subjected to six water stress levels 100% ETc (T100), 90% ETc (T90), 80% ETc (T80), 70% ETc (T70), 60% ETc (T60) and 50% ETc (T50) at vegetative and late season growth stages. The onion yield and quality based on physical characteristics and irrigation water use efficiency were determined. The results indicated that the variation in yield ranged from 34.4 ton/ha to 18.9 ton/ha and the bulb size ranged from 64 mm to 35 mm in diameter for T100 and T50 respectively. Irrigation water use efficiency values decreased with increasing water application level with the highest of 16.2 kg/ha/mm at T50, and the lowest being13.1 kg/ha/mm at T100. It was concluded that DI at vegetative and late growth stages influence yields in a positive linear trend with increasing quantity of irrigation water and decreasing water stress reaching optimum yield of 32.0 ton/ha at 20% water stress (T80) thereby saving 10.7% irrigation water. Onion bulb production at this level optimizes water productivity without significantly affecting yields. DI influenced the size and size distribution of fresh onion bulbs, with low size variation of the fresh bulbs at T80.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion yield ranged from 34.4 ton/ha at T100 to 18.9 ton/ha at T50.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T100e0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
34.4 ton/hae0
Qualifier
18.9 ton/hae0
Comparator
T50e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variation in yield ranged from 34.4 ton/ha to 18.9 ton/ha and the bulb size ranged from 64 mm to 35 mm in diameter for T100 and T50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion bulb diameter ranged from 64 mm at T100 to 35 mm at T50.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T100e0
Outcome
bulb sizee0
Value
64 mme0
Qualifier
35 mme0
Comparator
T50e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variation in yield ranged from 34.4 ton/ha to 18.9 ton/ha and the bulb size ranged from 64 mm to 35 mm in diameter for T100 and T50 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water use efficiency fell as water application increased.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
increasing water application levele0
Outcome
Irrigation water use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation water use efficiency values decreased with increasing water application level with the highest of 16.2 kg/ha/mm at T50, and the lowest being13.1 kg/ha/mm at T100.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T50 had the highest water use efficiency of 16.2 kg/ha/mm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T50e0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.2 kg/ha/mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest of 16.2 kg/ha/mm at T50, and the lowest being13.1 kg/ha/mm at T100.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T100 had the lowest water use efficiency of 13.1 kg/ha/mm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T100e0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13.1 kg/ha/mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest of 16.2 kg/ha/mm at T50, and the lowest being13.1 kg/ha/mm at T100.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T80 produced 32.0 ton/ha at 20% water stress while saving 10.7% irrigation water.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
20% water stress (T80)e0
Outcome
optimum yielde0
Direction
optimume0
Value
32.0 ton/hae0
Qualifier
saving 10.7% irrigation watere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reaching optimum yield of 32.0 ton/ha at 20% water stress (T80) thereby saving 10.7% irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At T80 water productivity was optimized without a significant yield reduction.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae0
Treatment
this levele0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
optimizese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Onion bulb production at this level optimizes water productivity without significantly affecting yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation influenced fresh bulb size and size distribution, with low size variation at T80.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
size and size distribution of fresh onion bulbse0
Qualifier
low size variation of the fresh bulbs at T80e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DI influenced the size and size distribution of fresh onion bulbs, with low size variation of the fresh bulbs at T80.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1495 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.