Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Role of soil organic carbon on root-knot disease of cotton and uptake of a few biochemical constituents

K.K. Verma; R.K. Jain

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growth of cotton plants increased significantly with corresponding increase in organic'carbon from 0.58% (10 g FYM/kg soil) to 1.27% (30 g FYM/kg soil) which was at par with 1.63 (40 g FYM/kg soil) However, nematode galling and reproduction decreased with increasing level of organic carbon. The disease intensity was maximum in unmanured check. Both under nematode inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, uptake of N, P, K total sugar and total phenol was higher in FYM supplemented plant compared to unamended soils. However, non-inoculated plants recorded higher uptake and contents. Further, irrespective of nematisation, uptake of these constituents was highest at 1.27 and 1.63% organic carbon while lowest in soils having 0.27% (check) and 0.58% organic carbon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton growth increased as organic carbon increased.

Treatment
organic'carbone0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.58% (10 g FYM/kg soil) to 1.27% (30 g FYM/kg soil)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of cotton plants increased significantly with corresponding increase in organic'carbon from 0.58% (10 g FYM/kg soil) to 1.27% (30 g FYM/kg soil) which was at par with 1.63 (40 g FYM/kg soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode galling and reproduction decreased with organic carbon.

Treatment
organic carbone0
Outcome
nematode galling and reproductione0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode galling and reproduction decreased with increasing level of organic carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease intensity was maximum in unmanured check.

Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease intensity was maximum in unmanured check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased uptake of N, P, K, sugar and phenol.

Treatment
FYM supplementede0
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K total sugar and total phenole0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unamended soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both under nematode inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, uptake of N, P, K total sugar and total phenol was higher in FYM supplemented plant compared to unamended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inoculated plants had higher uptake and contents.

Treatment
non-inoculatede0
Outcome
uptake and contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-inoculated plants recorded higher uptake and contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Constituent uptake was highest at 1.27 and 1.63% organic carbon.

Treatment
organic carbone0
Outcome
uptake of these constituentse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uptake of these constituents was highest at 1.27 and 1.63% organic carbon while lowest in soils having 0.27% (check) and 0.58% organic carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.