Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed and fertility management effects on grain yield and economics of finger millet following groundnut

G.N. Dhanapal; M. T. Sanjay; G. R. Hareesh; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2010 with finger millet Hebbal, Bengaluru. The finger millet crop was grown followed by groundnut during summer and continued up to 2014. The pooled data of five years of finger millet crop from 2010 to 2014 during Kharif indicated that application of butachlor at 0.75 kg/ha more or less gave similar grain yield (3.12 t/ha) to hand weeding twice (3.52 t/ha) due to good control of weeds. Continuous application of alachlor 1.0 kg/ha in groundnut and 2,4-D sodium salt 0.75 kg/ha in finger millet paved way for dominance of grasses particularly Digitaria marginata, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Echinochloa colona, whereas pendimethalin treated plots showed higher emergence of Commelina benghalensis. A saving in weeding cost to an extent of ‘ 6,810 to ‘ 6,980/ha in finger millet was realized by using herbicides as compared to hand weeding. None of the herbicides affected the establishment, growth and yield of succeeding crops over the past five years, in spite of herbicides being applied continuously on the same piece of land.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butachlor produced similar finger millet grain yield to twice hand weeding.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
application of butachlor at 0.75 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
3.12 t/hae0
Qualifier
3.52 t/hae0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of butachlor at 0.75 kg/ha more or less gave similar grain yield (3.12 t/ha) to hand weeding twice (3.52 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated alachlor and 2,4-D use favored dominance of three grasses.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
2,4-D sodium salt 0.75 kg/hae0
Interactor
Digitaria marginatae0weed
Outcome
dominance of grassese0
Direction
dominancee0
Qualifier
Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Echinochloa colonae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous application of alachlor 1.0 kg/ha in groundnut and 2,4-D sodium salt 0.75 kg/ha in finger millet paved way for dominance of grasses particularly Digitaria marginata, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Echinochloa colona”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plots had greater emergence of Commelina benghalensis.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
pendimethaline0
Interactor
Commelina benghalensisCommelina benghalensise0weed
Outcome
emergence of Commelina benghalensise0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Commelina benghalensis
Commelina benghalensis · InteractorHerb Pilcher, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin treated plots showed higher emergence of Commelina benghalensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides saved finger millet weeding costs relative to hand weeding.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
weeding coste0
Direction
savinge0
Value
‘ 6,810 to ‘ 6,980/hae0
Comparator
hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A saving in weeding cost to an extent of ‘ 6,810 to ‘ 6,980/ha in finger millet was realized by using herbicides as compared to hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continued herbicide use did not affect succeeding crop establishment, growth or yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
establishment, growth and yield of succeeding cropse0
Direction
None of the herbicides affectede0
Qualifier
over the past five yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the herbicides affected the establishment, growth and yield of succeeding crops over the past five years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑

butachlor · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.