Paper · 2010 · Plant Soil and Environment

Effect of salinity and radiation on proline accumulation in seeds of canola (Brassica napus L.)

M. Ashrafijou; S.A. Sadat Noori; A. Izadi Darbandi; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
43
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Since laser beam may affect plant traits, it was used to enhance accumulation of proline in rapeseed and therefore to improve its tolerance to the salinity stress. This investigation was performed to study the effect of NaCl concentration in irrigated water (0, 100, 200 and 300 mmol NaCl) on proline accumulation of Canola (Brassica napus L.) after laser irradiation (Red, Infra-red and Nd:YAG) at two exposure treatments. In each exposure, seeds were irradiated for three minutes once or twice by the laser set. Free proline content in leaves increased significantly by increasing of NaCl concentration. Also proline content significantly increased with irradiation by laser beam. The Red laser irradiation used once and the Nd:YAG laser used twice had the greatest effect on the proline content whereas the Infrared laser had a low effect. Double application of irradiation induced a significantly higher amount of proline in the leaves compared to only one application. This is the first report on using different lasers irradiation on proline content in a winter rapeseed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NaCl concentration significantly increased leaf free proline.

Taxon
Canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
increasing of NaCl concentratione0
Outcome
Free proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Free proline content in leaves increased significantly by increasing of NaCl concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Laser irradiation significantly increased leaf proline.

Taxon
Canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
irradiation by laser beame0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“proline content significantly increased with irradiation by laser beam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One red laser exposure had the greatest effect on leaf proline.

Taxon
Canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
Red laser irradiation used oncee0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
Infrared lasere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Red laser irradiation used once and the Nd:YAG laser used twice had the greatest effect on the proline content whereas the Infrared laser had a low effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Nd:YAG laser exposures had the greatest effect on leaf proline.

Taxon
Canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
Nd:YAG laser used twicee0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
Infrared lasere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Red laser irradiation used once and the Nd:YAG laser used twice had the greatest effect on the proline content whereas the Infrared laser had a low effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infrared laser had a low effect on leaf proline compared with the strongest laser exposures.

Taxon
Canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
Infrared lasere0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
Red laser irradiation used oncee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Red laser irradiation used once and the Nd:YAG laser used twice had the greatest effect on the proline content whereas the Infrared laser had a low effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irradiation applications produced significantly more leaf proline than one.

Taxon
Canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
Double application of irradiatione0
Outcome
amount of prolinee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
only one applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Double application of irradiation induced a significantly higher amount of proline in the leaves compared to only one application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–972 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.