Paper · 1984 · Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Effect of ammonia level and treatment temperature on intake and digestibility of wheat straw by lambs

A. Laytimi; K. Bolsen; B. Janicki

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia in three environmental chambers at 37, 68, or 95 F, for 23 days. Then digestibility was measured (wethers). Rations were 88% wheat straw and 12% supplement. The control wheat straw was non-ammoniated but contained 5% urea in the supplement. Stack temperatures increased rapidly within 2.5 hours post-ammoniation, and equilibrated at chamber temperatures for the rest of the treatment period. Both crude protein (CP) and in vitro matter digestibility of the WS increased with ammonia level and treatment temperature. Percent of the ammonia recovered increased with temperature and was always higher with the low ammonia level treatment. Ammoniation improved ration intakes and dry matter digestibility, but did not increase CP digestibility which decreased as temperature increased. Ammoniation solubilized the hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignin and increased the digestibility of the fiber components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein and in vitro matter digestibility of wheat straw increased with ammonia level and treatment temperature.

Treatment
ammonia levele0
Outcome
crude protein (CP) and in vitro matter digestibilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both crude protein (CP) and in vitro matter digestibility of the WS increased with ammonia level and treatment temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–605 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent of the ammonia recovered from wheat straw increased with treatment temperature.

Treatment
temperaturee1
Outcome
Percent of the ammonia recoverede1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Percent of the ammonia recovered increased with temperature and was always higher with the low ammonia level treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–725 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent of the ammonia recovered was higher with the low ammonia level treatment.

Treatment
low ammonia levele1
Outcome
Percent of the ammonia recoverede1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Percent of the ammonia recovered increased with temperature and was always higher with the low ammonia level treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–725 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammoniation improved ration intake and dry matter digestibility of wheat straw.

Treatment
Ammoniatione2
Outcome
ration intakes and dry matter digestibilitye2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Ammoniation improved ration intakes and dry matter digestibility, but did not increase CP digestibility which decreased as temperature increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–871 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammoniation did not increase crude protein digestibility of wheat straw.

Treatment
Ammoniatione2
Outcome
CP digestibilitye2
Direction
did not increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Ammoniation improved ration intakes and dry matter digestibility, but did not increase CP digestibility which decreased as temperature increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–871 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein digestibility of wheat straw decreased as treatment temperature increased.

Treatment
temperaturee2
Outcome
CP digestibilitye2
Direction
decreasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Ammoniation improved ration intakes and dry matter digestibility, but did not increase CP digestibility which decreased as temperature increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–871 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammoniation solubilized the hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignin of wheat straw.

Treatment
Ammoniatione3
Outcome
hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignine3
Direction
solubilizede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Ammoniation solubilized the hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignin and increased the digestibility of the fiber components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–994 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammoniation increased the digestibility of the fiber components of wheat straw.

Treatment
Ammoniatione3
Outcome
digestibility of the fiber componentse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Ammoniation solubilized the hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignin and increased the digestibility of the fiber components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–994 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stack temperatures of ammoniated wheat straw increased rapidly within 2.5 hours after ammoniation.

Outcome
Stack temperaturese4
Qualifier
increased rapidly within 2.5 hours post-ammoniatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Stack temperatures increased rapidly within 2.5 hours post-ammoniation, and equilibrated at chamber temperatures for the rest of the treatment period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–481 · show in text ↑
e5

“Replicate, covered wheat straw (WS) stacks were treated with 1.5 or 3.0% anhydrous ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑

ammonia · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.