Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 in alfisols of Anantapur with object of evaluating the bio-fertilizers on root nodulation, growth and yield of groundnut and their performance in association with organic and inorganic manures. The treatments consisted of bio-fertilizers (Rhizobium and PSB) alone and in combination with organic and inorganic manures. The results indicated that the nodule number was not significantly influenced by different sources of bio-fertilizers either alone or in combination with organic and inorganic fertilizers. Application of bio-fertilizer (Rhizobium + phosphiite solubilising bacteria) along with organic and inorganic manures did not influence the pod yield of groundnut, since the Rhizobium already existing in the soil is sufficient for growth and yield of groundnut.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer sources alone or with organic and inorganic fertilizers did not significantly affect groundnut nodule number.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- different sources of bio-fertilizers either alone or in combination with organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- nodule numbere0
- Direction
- not significantly influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated that the nodule number was not significantly influenced by different sources of bio-fertilizers either alone or in combination with organic and inorganic fertilizers.”
e1“root nodulation, growth and yield of groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria with manures did not influence groundnut pod yield.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- bio-fertilizer (Rhizobium + phosphiite solubilising bacteria) along with organic and inorganic manurese0
- Second interactor
- phosphiite solubilising bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- pod yield of groundnute0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of bio-fertilizer (Rhizobium + phosphiite solubilising bacteria) along with organic and inorganic manures did not influence the pod yield of groundnut”
t0“GROUNDNUT”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed the lack of yield response to Rhizobium already in the soil.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Outcome
- growth and yield of groundnute0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“since the Rhizobium already existing in the soil is sufficient for growth and yield of groundnut.”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
217 papers more in this group
See all 221 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.