Paper · 1994 · Journal of Entomological Research

Toxicity of diflubenzuron against Heliothis armigera Hub. and Spodoptera litura Fab. larvae-minimum feeding period required to lead mortality*

Sanjay Vaishampayan; R. R. Verma

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The minimum feeding period required to lead mortality in the second instar larvae of Heliothis armigera Hub. and Spodoptera litura Fab. fed respectively on leaves of gram and soybean treated with diflubenzuron 0.0125% spray was studied. In the case of H. armigera, 4 hours feeding period gave 100 per cent mortality of larvae seven days after treatment, whereas only one hour was required for S. litura larvae tn obtain 90–100 per cent kill within 7–8 days after treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four hours feeding on treated gram leaves gave 100 per cent H. armigera larval mortality after seven days.

Taxon
gramt0
Treatment
diflubenzuron 0.0125% spraye1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
mortality of larvaee0
Direction
100 per cent mortalitye0
Value
100 per cente0
Qualifier
4 hours feeding periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of H. armigera, 4 hours feeding period gave 100 per cent mortality of larvae seven days after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of gram and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum feeding period required to lead mortality in the second instar larvae of Heliothis armigera Hub. and Spodoptera litura Fab. fed respectively on leaves of gram and soybean treated with diflubenzuron 0.0125% spray was studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One hour feeding on treated soybean leaves caused 90–100 per cent S. litura larval mortality within 7–8 days.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
diflubenzuron 0.0125% spraye1
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Outcome
S. litura larvaee0
Direction
kille0
Value
90–100 per cente0
Qualifier
only one houre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only one hour was required for S. litura larvae tn obtain 90–100 per cent kill within 7–8 days after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of gram and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum feeding period required to lead mortality in the second instar larvae of Heliothis armigera Hub. and Spodoptera litura Fab. fed respectively on leaves of gram and soybean treated with diflubenzuron 0.0125% spray was studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–236 · show in text ↑

diflubenzuron · Spodoptera litura · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Spodoptera litura · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.