Abstract
A field experiments was conducted during rabi 2006–2007 and 2007–2008 to study the effect of integrated nutrient management modules applied to mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czernj and Coss.) on seed yield and soil properties. The study revealed that higher values of growth parameters, viz. number of branches, plant height, yield attributes, seed (1857 and 1760 kg ha-1) and stover (6491 and 6150 kg ha-1) yield of mustard were recorded in plots receiving 75% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1+ 25 kg S ha-1+ Azotobacter, whichwas followed by 75% RDF + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 + 25 kg S ha-1 during both the years, respectively. A saving of inorganic fertilizers to the extent of 25% was recorded with the use of 5 t,10 t FYM or 25kg S ha-1 without reduction in seed yield of mustard. Application of 75% RDF + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 + 25 kg S ha-1 + Azotobacter recordedon an average maximum gross andnet return of ‘ 41560 and ‘ 24081 ha-1, respectively, but benefit: cost ratio was highest in 100% RDF (1.50), followed by the above combination. The latter treatment, viz. incorporation of FYM, zinc, sulphur and Azotobacter along with either 75% or 50% RDF increased soil organic carbon, available N, P, K, S and Zn besides improving soil physical properties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
The combined 75% RDF, FYM, zinc, sulfur and Azotobacter module gave the highest mustard growth parameters and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- mustarde0
- Treatment
- 75% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1+ 25 kg S ha-1+ Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- growth parameters, viz. number of branches, plant height, yield attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher values of growth parameters, viz. number of branches, plant height, yield attributes, seed (1857 and 1760 kg ha-1) and stover (6491 and 6150 kg ha-1) yield of mustard were recorded in plots receiving 75% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1+ 25 kg S ha-1+ Azotobacter”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined module produced mustard seed yields of 1857 and 1760 kg ha-1 in the two years.
- Taxon
- mustarde0
- Treatment
- 75% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1+ 25 kg S ha-1+ Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- seede0
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 1857 and 1760 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed (1857 and 1760 kg ha-1) and stover (6491 and 6150 kg ha-1) yield of mustard were recorded in plots receiving 75% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1+ 25 kg S ha-1+ Azotobacter”
e1“higher values of growth parameters, viz. number of branches, plant height, yield attributes, seed”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined module produced mustard stover yields of 6491 and 6150 kg ha-1 in the two years.
- Taxon
- mustarde0
- Treatment
- 75% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1+ 25 kg S ha-1+ Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- stovere0
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 6491 and 6150 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“stover (6491 and 6150 kg ha-1) yield of mustard were recorded in plots receiving 75% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1+ 25 kg S ha-1+ Azotobacter”
e1“higher values of growth parameters, viz. number of branches, plant height, yield attributes, seed”
Claim · model-written summary
Using FYM or sulfur saved 25% of inorganic fertilizer without lowering mustard seed yield.
- Taxon
- mustarde0
- Treatment
- 5 t,10 t FYM or 25kg S ha-1e0
- Outcome
- seed yield of mustarde0
- Direction
- without reductione0
- Value
- 25%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“A saving of inorganic fertilizers to the extent of 25% was recorded with the use of 5 t,10 t FYM or 25kg S ha-1 without reduction in seed yield of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
The full combination had the maximum gross return of 41560 per hectare.
- Taxon
- mustardt0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 + 25 kg S ha-1 + Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- grosse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- ‘ 41560e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 75% RDF + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 + 25 kg S ha-1 + Azotobacter recordedon an average maximum gross andnet return of ‘ 41560 and ‘ 24081 ha-1, respectively”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
The full combination had the maximum net return of 24081 per hectare.
- Taxon
- mustardt0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 + 25 kg S ha-1 + Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- ‘ 24081 ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 75% RDF + 5 t FYM ha-1 + 10 kg Zn ha-1 + 25 kg S ha-1 + Azotobacter recordedon an average maximum gross andnet return of ‘ 41560 and ‘ 24081 ha-1, respectively”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit to cost ratio was highest under 100% RDF, at 1.50.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0 - Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.50e0
- Comparator
- above combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit: cost ratio was highest in 100% RDF (1.50), followed by the above combination”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM, zinc, sulfur and Azotobacter with 75% or 50% RDF increased soil organic carbon and available nutrients.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- incorporation of FYM, zinc, sulphur and Azotobacter along with either 75% or 50% RDFe0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- soil organic carbon, available N, P, K, S and Zne0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“incorporation of FYM, zinc, sulphur and Azotobacter along with either 75% or 50% RDF increased soil organic carbon, available N, P, K, S and Zn”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM, zinc, sulfur and Azotobacter with 75% or 50% RDF improved soil physical properties.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- incorporation of FYM, zinc, sulphur and Azotobacter along with either 75% or 50% RDFe0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- soil physical propertiese0
- Direction
- improvinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“incorporation of FYM, zinc, sulphur and Azotobacter along with either 75% or 50% RDF increased soil organic carbon, available N, P, K, S and Zn besides improving soil physical properties”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
135 papers more in this group
See all 139 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.