Abstract
The experiment was conducted on six years old plants of pomegranate with four levels of irrigation, i.e. 4, 8 and 12 I of water/hour applied through drip for three hours daily at flowering and fruiting time along with a control with basin irrigation system on pan evaporation basis @ 60 I per square meter of area of basin. The plants irrigated through drip were more vigorous than basin irrigation system. Irrigation through drip @ 8 I/hour/day for three hours increased the yield from 17.7 kg/plant under control to 28.2 kg/plant with a considerable reduction in cracking. The quality of fruits in terms of weight, size and juice content was better under drip irrigated plants as compared to control. However, the T.S.S. of the juice was slightly reduced in drip irrigated plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigated pomegranate plants were more vigorous than basin irrigated plants.
- Taxon
- pomegranate
Punica granatumt0 - Treatment
- dripe0
- Outcome
- vigorouse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- basin irrigation systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The plants irrigated through drip were more vigorous than basin irrigation system”
t0“pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at 8 I/hour/day increased yield from 17.7 to 28.2 kg per plant.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Treatment
- drip @ 8 I/hour/day for three hourse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 28.2 kg/plante0
- Qualifier
- 17.7 kg/plante0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation through drip @ 8 I/hour/day for three hours increased the yield from 17.7 kg/plant under control to 28.2 kg/plant with a considerable reduction in cracking.”
t0“pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at 8 I/hour/day reduced fruit cracking.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Treatment
- drip @ 8 I/hour/day for three hourse0
- Outcome
- crackinge0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation through drip @ 8 I/hour/day for three hours increased the yield from 17.7 kg/plant under control to 28.2 kg/plant with a considerable reduction in cracking.”
t0“pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation improved fruit weight, size and juice content relative to basin irrigation.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigated plantse0
- Outcome
- weight, size and juice contente0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quality of fruits in terms of weight, size and juice content was better under drip irrigated plants as compared to control”
t0“pomegranate”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation slightly reduced juice T.S.S.
- Taxon
- pomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Treatment
- drip irrigated plantse0
- Outcome
- T.S.S. of the juicee0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the T.S.S. of the juice was slightly reduced in drip irrigated plants”
t0“pomegranate”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.