Paper · 2010 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Salicylic Acid Seed Priming on Some Physiological Traits of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Under Water Deficit at Podding Stage

F. Shekari; A. Pakmehr; M. Rastgoo; et al.

14
claims
34
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The effects of seed priming by salicylic acid on some physiological traits of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) cv. Parastou were investigated under water deficit conditions at podding stage. Experiment was done as a split block design with 3 replications in 2008 at Research Station of Zanjan University. Main factor consisted of two levels of irrigation (normal irrigation and deficit irrigation at podding stages) and seed priming with salicylic acid as a sub factor in 5 levels (0, 900, 1800, 2700, 3600 µM). Analysis of variance showed that irrigation and salicylic acid had significant effects on all characters. Furthermore, interaction between irrigation and salicylic acid were significant only for leaf relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll and seed yield. Mean comparisons showed that relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll and seed yield decreased due to water deficit as compared to normal irrigation, but leaf internal CO2 increased. These traits, except leaf internal CO2 wereincreased through primed seed priming as compared to untreated seeds. Priming of seeds with 2700 µM salicylic acid had desirable effect on all traits compared to other treatments in irrigated and water deficit conditions. Seed priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid caused higher relative water content, which protects plants against water stress. In addition to increasing chlorophyll content and stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rates of plant increased. Thus, seed priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid produced highest seed yield (4424 and 2475 kg.ha-1) in both regular and deficits irrigations at podding stage, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and salicylic acid significantly affected all measured traits.

Outcome
all characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance showed that irrigation and salicylic acid had significant effects on all characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and salicylic acid interacted significantly for relative water content, photosynthesis, chlorophyll and yield.

Treatment
irrigation and salicylic acide0
Outcome
leaf relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll ae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between irrigation and salicylic acid were significant only for leaf relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced relative water content and photosynthetic rates compared with normal irrigation.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
relative water content, photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll and seed yield decreased due to water deficit as compared to normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll compared with normal irrigation.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll and seed yield decreased due to water deficit as compared to normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced seed yield compared with normal irrigation.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
normal irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll and seed yield decreased due to water deficit as compared to normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased leaf internal CO2.

Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
leaf internal CO2e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but leaf internal CO2 increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“water deficit as compared to normal irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming increased relative water content and photosynthetic rates relative to untreated seeds.

Treatment
primed seed priminge0
Outcome
relative water content, photosynthetic ratese1
Direction
wereincreasede0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These traits, except leaf internal CO2 wereincreased through primed seed priming as compared to untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative water content, photosynthetic rates, content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming increased chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll relative to untreated seeds.

Treatment
primed seed priminge0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophylle1
Direction
wereincreasede0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These traits, except leaf internal CO2 wereincreased through primed seed priming as compared to untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming increased seed yield relative to untreated seeds.

Treatment
primed seed priminge0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
wereincreasede0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These traits, except leaf internal CO2 wereincreased through primed seed priming as compared to untreated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed yield decreased due to water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid had desirable effects on all traits compared with other treatments under both irrigation conditions.

Treatment
2700 µM salicylic acide0
Outcome
all traitse0
Direction
desirable effecte0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Priming of seeds with 2700 µM salicylic acid had desirable effect on all traits compared to other treatments in irrigated and water deficit conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid increased relative water content.

Treatment
2700 µM salicylic acide0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid caused higher relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid increased chlorophyll content and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
2700 µM salicylic acide1
Outcome
chlorophyll content and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition to increasing chlorophyll content and stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rates of plant increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid increased photosynthetic rates.

Treatment
2700 µM salicylic acide1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rates of plant increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid gave the highest regular irrigation seed yield, 4424 kg.ha-1.

Treatment
2700 µM salicylic acide0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4424 and 2475 kg.ha-1e0
Qualifier
regular and deficits irrigations at podding stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with 2700 µM salicylic acid produced highest seed yield (4424 and 2475 kg.ha-1) in both regular and deficits irrigations at podding stage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.