Abstract
The present experiment was carried out during the kharif 2010 at Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh. The experiment was laid out in the factorial randomized block design with four replications and nine treatment combinations, considering three levels each of zinc (0, 25 and 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1) and iron (0, 25 and 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1). The application of ZnSO4 did not produced any significant effect on content of all the nutrients in stalk at all the growth stages and its content in pod except S and Zn content at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod. The significantly higher S content (0.596, 0.538, 0.327 and 0.455 %) and Zn content (133, 149, 206 and 119 mg kg−1) in stalk at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod with the soil application of 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1, respectively. The application of 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1 significantly increased the uptake Zn (137, 263 and 400 g ha−1) by pod, stalk and its total uptake by okra as compared to control. While, significantly increased in uptake of Fe (2230 and 2418 g ha−1) by stalk and its total uptake with soil application of 50 Kg ZnSO4 ha−1, respectively. The application of FeSO4 also did not produced any significant effect on content of all the nutrients in stalk at all the growth stages and its content in pod except S and Fe content at in stalk 30, 60, at harvest and in pod. The significantly higher S content (0.585, 0.537, 0.324 and 0.455%) and Fe content (1193, 1284, 1027 and 298 mg kg−1) in stalk at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod with the soil application of 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1, respectively. The application of 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1 significantly increased Fe (202, 2265 and 2466 g ha1) by pod, stalk and its total uptake by okra as compared to control. While, significantly increased in uptake of Zn (135 and 388 g ha−1) by pod and its total uptake with application of 50 kg FeS04 ha−1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulfate did not significantly affect most stalk and pod nutrient contents.
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- ZnSO4e0
- Outcome
- content of all the nutrientse0
- Direction
- did not produced any significant effecte0
- Qualifier
- except S and Zn contente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The application of ZnSO4 did not produced any significant effect on content of all the nutrients in stalk at all the growth stages and its content in pod except S and Zn content at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1, sulfur content was higher at 30 and 60 days, harvest and in pods.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Organ / stage
- stalke0
- Treatment
- 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- S contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.596, 0.538, 0.327 and 0.455 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher S content (0.596, 0.538, 0.327 and 0.455 %) and Zn content (133, 149, 206 and 119 mg kg−1) in stalk at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod with the soil application of 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1, respectively.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1, zinc content was higher at 30 and 60 days, harvest and in pods.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Zn contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 133, 149, 206 and 119 mg kg−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher S content (0.596, 0.538, 0.327 and 0.455 %) and Zn content (133, 149, 206 and 119 mg kg−1) in stalk at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod with the soil application of 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1, respectively.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulfate at 50 kg increased zinc uptake by pod, stalk and whole okra relative to control.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- uptake Zne0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 137, 263 and 400 g ha−1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1 significantly increased the uptake Zn (137, 263 and 400 g ha−1) by pod, stalk and its total uptake by okra as compared to control.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulfate at 50 Kg increased stalk and total iron uptake.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 Kg ZnSO4 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- uptake of Fee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2230 and 2418 g ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly increased in uptake of Fe (2230 and 2418 g ha−1) by stalk and its total uptake with soil application of 50 Kg ZnSO4 ha−1”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron sulfate did not significantly affect most stalk and pod nutrient contents.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- FeSO4e0
- Outcome
- content of all the nutrientse0
- Direction
- did not produced any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of FeSO4 also did not produced any significant effect on content of all the nutrients in stalk at all the growth stages and its content in pod except S and Fe content at in stalk 30, 60, at harvest and in pod.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1, sulfur content was higher at 30 and 60 days, harvest and in pods.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- S contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.585, 0.537, 0.324 and 0.455%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher S content (0.585, 0.537, 0.324 and 0.455%) and Fe content (1193, 1284, 1027 and 298 mg kg−1) in stalk at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod with the soil application of 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1, respectively.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1, iron content was higher at 30 and 60 days, harvest and in pods.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Fe contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1193, 1284, 1027 and 298 mg kg−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly higher S content (0.585, 0.537, 0.324 and 0.455%) and Fe content (1193, 1284, 1027 and 298 mg kg−1) in stalk at 30, 60, at harvest and in pod with the soil application of 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1, respectively.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron sulfate at 50 kg increased pod, stalk and total iron uptake relative to control.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 202, 2265 and 2466 g ha1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of 50 kg FeSO4 ha−1 significantly increased Fe (202, 2265 and 2466 g ha1) by pod, stalk and its total uptake by okra as compared to control.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Iron sulfate at 50 kg increased pod and total zinc uptake.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 kg FeS04 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- uptake of Zne0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 135 and 388 g ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly increased in uptake of Zn (135 and 388 g ha−1) by pod and its total uptake with application of 50 kg FeS04 ha−1”
t0“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.