Paper · 2015 · East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal

Use of low cost pest exclusion nets can boost cabbage yield

J. Kiptoo; M. Kasina; F. Wanjala; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, low-cost pest exclusion nets (lcPENs) were evaluated to determine their efficacy in reducing pest infestation and enhancing yields of cabbage at KALRO Kabete and PTC (Practical Training Centre) Thika, Kenya, from March to September 2011 both at nursery and field production levels. Nets of two-mesh sizes (0.9 mm and 0.4 mm) were used whereby the 0.9 mm net was either impregnated or not impregnated with alpha cypermethrin to enhance efficacy through repellency effects of the pesticides. The lcPENs efficiency was compared with no-net use and grass shading (farmer practice) in a completely randomized block design with five replications. Results showed that diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larval infestation was lower (P<0.05) on cabbages covered with lcPENs both at nursery and field level. At nursery, aphids were lower (P<0.05) on seedlings covered with insecticide-impregnated lcPEN but in field conditions, there was no difference among the lcPENs. Cabbage yield was higher (P<0.05) on cabbages grown under lcPENs. The findings clearly demonstrate high incomes as a result of growing cabbages under lcPENs. However, there was no evidence of an increased role for insecticide impregnation except in the nets at nursery level. Hence farmers can use ordinary (un-impregnated) lcPENs for pest management in transplanted cabbage production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nets lowered diamondback moth larval infestation at nursery and field levels.

Treatment
lcPENse0
Interactor
Plutella xylostellaPlutella xylostellae0pest
Outcome
diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larval infestatione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larval infestation was lower (P<0.05) on cabbages covered with lcPENs both at nursery and field level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide impregnated netting lowered aphids on nursery seedlings.

Treatment
insecticide-impregnated lcPENe0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At nursery, aphids were lower (P<0.05) on seedlings covered with insecticide-impregnated lcPEN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field aphid infestation did not differ among net types.

Treatment
lcPENse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
Outcome
aphidse1
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
lcPENse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in field conditions, there was no difference among the lcPENs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“aphids were lower (P<0.05) on seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage yield was higher under nets.

Treatment
lcPENse0
Outcome
Cabbage yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cabbage yield was higher (P<0.05) on cabbages grown under lcPENs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1044 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing cabbage under nets yielded high incomes.

Treatment
lcPENse0
Outcome
high incomese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high incomes as a result of growing cabbages under lcPENs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide impregnation showed no added role except in nursery nets.

Treatment
insecticide impregnatione0
Outcome
increased rolee0
Direction
no evidence of an increasede0
Qualifier
except in the nets at nursery levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no evidence of an increased role for insecticide impregnation except in the nets at nursery level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend unimpregnated nets for transplanted cabbage pest management.

Outcome
ordinary (un-impregnated) lcPENs for pest managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers can use ordinary (un-impregnated) lcPENs for pest management in transplanted cabbage production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1365 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · Plutella xylostella · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

trap barrier · Aphidomorpha · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · Aphidomorpha · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.