Abstract
The studies were conducted on cucumber cultivar Aramis, treated and not treated with biostimulants: Asahi SL and Siapton 10 L in the glasshouse of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences and in the Laboratory of Entomology Department. Plants were cultivated in two glasshouse chambers and western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande) was introduced to one of the chambers. The aim of the study was to evaluate if application of biostimulants to cucumber crop can increase the level of plant tolerance to thrips. Intensity of growth, photosynthesis and yield were compared in the plants treated and not treated with biostimulants. Cucumber plants tolerated injuries caused by thrips. They accelerated the growth and photosynthesis intensity in the first 4 weeks of pest feeding. This phenomenon was more evident in the plants treated with biostimulants, especially with Siapton 10 L. The yield was not significantly affected by thrips and biostimulants after 4 as well as after 6 weeks of thrips feeding. Badania prowadzono w szklarni Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie oraz w laboratorium Katedry Entomologii Stosowanej, na ogórku odmiany Aramis, traktowanym i nietraktowanym biostymulatorami Asahi SL i Siapton 10 L. Rośliny uprawiano w dwóch komorach szklarniowych. Do jednej z komór wprowadzono wciornastka zachodniego (Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande). Celem badań było określenie, czy zastosowanie wybranych biostymulatorów roślin w uprawie ogórka, może przyczynić się do zwiększenia poziomu tolerancji roślin na wciornastki. Porównywano intensywność wzrostu i fotosyntezy oraz plonowanie uszkodzonych roślin, traktowanych i nietraktowanych biostymulatorami. Rośliny ogórka wykazywały znaczną zdolność do tolerowania uszkodzeń wywołanych żerowaniem wciornastka zachodniego, przyspieszając wzrost i intensywność fotosyntezy w pierwszych 4 tygodniach żerowania szkodnika. Zjawisko to uwidaczniało się silniej u roślin traktowanych biostymulatorami, szczególnie preparatem Siapton 10 L. Żerowanie wciornastka przez okres 4 i 6 tygodni oraz zastosowane biostymulatory nie miały istotnego wpływu na plonowanie roślin.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Cucumber plants tolerated injuries caused by thrips.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativuse1 - Outcome
- tolerated injuriese1
ThripsOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Cucumber plants tolerated injuries caused by thrips”
Claim · model-written summary
Pest feeding accelerated the growth and photosynthesis intensity of cucumber in the first 4 weeks.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- pest feedinge2
- Outcome
- growth and photosynthesis intensitye2
- Direction
- acceleratede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cucumber cultivar Aramis, treated and not treated with biostimulants: Asahi SL and Siapton 10 L”
e2“They accelerated the growth and photosynthesis intensity in the first 4 weeks of pest feeding”
Claim · model-written summary
The growth and photosynthesis acceleration was more evident in cucumber treated with biostimulants, especially Siapton 10 L.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Material
- Aramise0
- Treatment
- biostimulantse4
- Outcome
- growth and photosynthesis intensitye4
- Direction
- more evidente4
- Comparator
- not treated with biostimulantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cucumber cultivar Aramis, treated and not treated with biostimulants: Asahi SL and Siapton 10 L”
e4“They accelerated the growth and photosynthesis intensity in the first 4 weeks of pest feeding. This phenomenon was more evident in the plants treated with biostimulants, especially with Siapton 10 L”
Claim · model-written summary
Thrips feeding did not significantly affect cucumber yield after 4 or 6 weeks.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- thrips feedinge5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- not significantly affectede5
- Qualifier
- after 4 as well as after 6 weekse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cucumber cultivar Aramis, treated and not treated with biostimulants: Asahi SL and Siapton 10 L”
e5“The yield was not significantly affected by thrips and biostimulants after 4 as well as after 6 weeks of thrips feeding”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulants did not significantly affect cucumber yield after 4 or 6 weeks of thrips feeding.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- biostimulantse5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- not significantly affectede5
- Qualifier
- after 4 as well as after 6 weekse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cucumber cultivar Aramis, treated and not treated with biostimulants: Asahi SL and Siapton 10 L”
e5“The yield was not significantly affected by thrips and biostimulants after 4 as well as after 6 weeks of thrips feeding”
The same questions in other papers
other · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
infection · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →infection · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →other · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.