Paper · 2004 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of fertigation on the growth and development of first ratoon crop (R1) of banana cv. Robusta (AAA) under high density planting system

M. Kavino; Nitin Kumar; K. Soorianathasundaram; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of fertigation with conventional fertilizers and water soluble fertilizers on the growth and development of first ratoon crop (R1) of banana cv. Robusta (AAA) under high density planting was studied. The plants fertigated with water soluble fertilizers exhibited a strong influence on plant morphology in terms of pseudostem height, girth, number of leaves and its area, LAI, total number of leaves produced and phyllochron. The application of water soluble fertilizers resulted in higher bunch weight, the conventional fertilizers application induced earlier cropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soluble fertilizer fertigation exhibited a strong influence on banana plant morphology relative to conventional fertilizers.

Taxon
banana cv. Robusta (AAA)e1
Material
cv. Robusta (AAA)e1
Organ / stage
first ratoon crop (R1)e1
Treatment
water soluble fertilizerse2
Outcome
plant morphologye2
Qualifier
in terms of pseudostem height, girth, number of leaves and its area, LAI, total number of leaves produced and phyllochrone2
Comparator
conventional fertilizerse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of fertigation with conventional fertilizers and water soluble fertilizers on the growth and development of first ratoon crop (R1) of banana cv. Robusta (AAA) under high density planting was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants fertigated with water soluble fertilizers exhibited a strong influence on plant morphology in terms of pseudostem height, girth, number of leaves and its area, LAI, total number of leaves produced and phyllochron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soluble fertilizer application resulted in higher banana bunch weight than conventional fertilizers.

Taxon
banana cv. Robusta (AAA)e1
Material
cv. Robusta (AAA)e1
Treatment
water soluble fertilizerse3
Outcome
bunch weighte3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
conventional fertilizerse1

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of fertigation with conventional fertilizers and water soluble fertilizers on the growth and development of first ratoon crop (R1) of banana cv. Robusta (AAA) under high density planting was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of water soluble fertilizers resulted in higher bunch weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional fertilizer application induced earlier cropping of banana compared with water soluble fertilizers.

Taxon
banana cv. Robusta (AAA)e1
Treatment
conventional fertilizerse4
Outcome
croppinge4
Direction
earliere4
Comparator
water soluble fertilizerse1

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of fertigation with conventional fertilizers and water soluble fertilizers on the growth and development of first ratoon crop (R1) of banana cv. Robusta (AAA) under high density planting was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e4

“the conventional fertilizers application induced earlier cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–579 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

128 papers: 118 positive, 10 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.