Paper · 2012 · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)

Effects of Microbial Inoculants on Biocontrol and Plant Growth Promotion

Maria Veronica Cepeda

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The expansion of organic agriculture has increased the demand for alternatives to chemical fertilizers and pesticides.Biopesticides and biofertilizers are part of a set of natural-based products being widely use to enrich the quality of the soil and control pests.In this study, a series of greenhouse and field bioassays were carried out with the aim of determining the biocontrol and biofertilizer effects of treatments prepared with Mitsuaria sp.strain H24L5A and Burkholderia sp.strain R4F2 in comparison with a commerciallyavailable Streptomyces inoculant on plants.Additionally, the effects of an experimental algae-based biofertilizer and commercial and pre-commercial biofertilizer products were assessed.First, a bioassay method was developed to successfully detect plant growth promotion and reduction of disease severity when the different treatments were applied by drenching.At a concentration of 10 7 cells/ml, Mitsuaria sp.provided the greatest biocontrol of bacterial leaf spot (P< 0.05) with a 39% reduction as compared to the negative control in tomato greenhouse bioassays.Although not statistically significant, field experiments showed a trend also indicating a 12% reduction in bacterial leaf spot by Mitsuaria sp.. Mitsuaria sp. and Burkholderia sp.treatments provided the greatest enhancements of shoot growth and biomass (P < 0.05) up to 64% as compared to the negative controls in tomato greenhouse bioassays.These data indicate the biocontrol and plant growth promoting activities of the experimental bacterial ingredients.Furthermore, the results indicated that these unformulated inoculants have utility comparable to that of iv commercial formulations.This is the first report of Mitsuaria sp.strain H24L5A and Burkholderia sp.strain R4F2 as biocontrol agents of bacterial leaf spot and plant growth promotion agents of tomato and wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mitsuaria reduced bacterial leaf spot by 39% relative to the negative control in tomato greenhouse bioassays.

Treatment
Mitsuaria sp.e0
Interactor
Mitsuaria sp.Roseatelese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bacterial leaf spote0
Direction
reductione0
Value
39%e0
Comparator
negative controle0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At a concentration of 10 7 cells/ml, Mitsuaria sp.provided the greatest biocontrol of bacterial leaf spot (P< 0.05) with a 39% reduction as compared to the negative control in tomato greenhouse bioassays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mitsuaria enhanced tomato shoot growth and biomass relative to negative controls.

Treatment
Mitsuaria sp.e0
Interactor
Mitsuaria sp.Roseatelese0symbiont
Outcome
shoot growth and biomasse0
Direction
enhancementse0
Value
up to 64%e0
Comparator
negative controlse0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mitsuaria sp. and Burkholderia sp.treatments provided the greatest enhancements of shoot growth and biomass (P < 0.05) up to 64% as compared to the negative controls in tomato greenhouse bioassays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Burkholderia enhanced tomato shoot growth and biomass relative to negative controls.

Treatment
Burkholderia sp.e0
Interactor
Burkholderia sp.Burkholderiae0symbiont
Outcome
shoot growth and biomasse0
Direction
enhancementse0
Value
up to 64%e0
Comparator
negative controlse0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia
Burkholderia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMelww at English Wikipedia · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mitsuaria sp. and Burkholderia sp.treatments provided the greatest enhancements of shoot growth and biomass (P < 0.05) up to 64% as compared to the negative controls in tomato greenhouse bioassays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1434 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unformulated inoculants had utility comparable to commercial formulations.

Outcome
utilitye0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
commercial formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these unformulated inoculants have utility comparable to that of iv commercial formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1681 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1866 · show in text ↑

Burkholderia · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Roseateles · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.