Paper · 2010

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen management for potato tuber yield, N recovery and N leaching.

Yang Fan; Rao Mylavarapu

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

As a controlled release N source, PSCU has the potential to increase total and marketable tuber yields with a single pre-plant application compared to urea source. However, there are still risks of leaching urea-N from a PSCU after the first few leaching events in sandy soils. Heavy early-season rainfall can deplete available soil N; thereby side-dress fertilizers might be still required to produce optimum tuber yields for both PSCU and urea treatments. Besides leaching, urea and urea-based controlled-release fertilizers can also result in volatilization and denitrification, resulting in lower N uptake as well as lower yields. Increase of N rate from 168 to 224 kg/ha barely benefits tuber yields, but increases the potential for leaching losses. Intermittent seepage irrigation can reduce water use and maintain or even increase tuber yield compared to the TSI if appropriate irrigation schedule is used. Nitrate leaching can also be minimized by supplying irrigation instead of over-nights over-days under ISI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSCU has potential to increase total and marketable tuber yields compared with urea.

Treatment
PSCUe0
Outcome
total and marketable tuber yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
urea sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“PSCU has the potential to increase total and marketable tuber yields with a single pre-plant application compared to urea source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–162 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSCU may leach urea-N after early leaching events in sandy soils.

Treatment
PSCUe0
Outcome
leaching urea-Ne0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“risks of leaching urea-N from a PSCU after the first few leaching events in sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–276 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy early-season rainfall can deplete available soil nitrogen.

Outcome
available soil Ne0
Direction
depletee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Heavy early-season rainfall can deplete available soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–334 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Side-dress fertilizer may be needed for optimum tuber yields with both nitrogen sources.

Outcome
side-dress fertilizers might be still requirede0
Qualifier
both PSCU and urea treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“side-dress fertilizers might be still required to produce optimum tuber yields for both PSCU and urea treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–456 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatilization and denitrification from urea fertilizers can reduce nitrogen uptake and yields.

Treatment
urea and urea-based controlled-release fertilizerse0
Outcome
lower N uptake as well as lower yieldse0
Qualifier
volatilization and denitrificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“urea and urea-based controlled-release fertilizers can also result in volatilization and denitrification, resulting in lower N uptake as well as lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N from 168 to 224 kg/ha barely benefited tuber yield.

Treatment
N rate from 168 to 224 kg/hae0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
barely benefitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increase of N rate from 168 to 224 kg/ha barely benefits tuber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N from 168 to 224 kg/ha increased leaching potential.

Treatment
N rate from 168 to 224 kg/hae0
Outcome
potential for leaching lossese0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increase of N rate from 168 to 224 kg/ha barely benefits tuber yields, but increases the potential for leaching losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent seepage irrigation can reduce water use compared with TSI.

Treatment
Intermittent seepage irrigatione0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
TSIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intermittent seepage irrigation can reduce water use and maintain or even increase tuber yield compared to the TSI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent seepage irrigation can maintain or increase tuber yield compared with TSI under suitable scheduling.

Treatment
Intermittent seepage irrigatione0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
maintain or even increasee0
Qualifier
if appropriate irrigation schedule is usede0
Comparator
TSIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intermittent seepage irrigation can reduce water use and maintain or even increase tuber yield compared to the TSI if appropriate irrigation schedule is used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–912 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 109 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.