Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season (July-November) of 2011 to evaluate the pearlmillet and clusterbean intercropping system in the arid region of Rajasthan. Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant. Sole pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 produced significantly maximum seed yield and had the maximum harvest index. Among intercropping treatments pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivarRGC-1003 in row ratio 1:1 resulted significantly maximum seed yield over other treatment. Pearlmillet cultivar Raj 171 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-1003 (1:1 row ratio)resulted in significantly maximumstover and biological yield. Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-986 in row ratio 1:3 was superior to all the intercropping treatments in terms of PMEY, net returns and B:C ratio. But LER ofpearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-986 in row ratio 2:2 was maximum among all the treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping pearlmillet HHB-67 with clusterbean RGC-1003 at row ratio 1:3 gave significantly maximum effective tillers per plant.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Material
- HHB-67e1
- Treatment
- clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003e1
- Outcome
- effective tillers per plante1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Setting
- arid region of Rajasthane4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant”
e4“in the arid region of Rajasthan”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearlmillet HHB-67 gave significantly maximum seed yield.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse2 - Material
- HHB-67e2
- Treatment
- Sole pearlmillete2
- Outcome
- seed yielde2
- Direction
- maximume2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Sole pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 produced significantly maximum seed yield and had the maximum harvest index”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearlmillet HHB-67 had the maximum harvest index.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse2 - Material
- HHB-67e2
- Treatment
- Sole pearlmillete2
- Outcome
- harvest indexe2
- Direction
- maximume2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Sole pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 produced significantly maximum seed yield and had the maximum harvest index”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearlmillet HHB-67 with clusterbean RGC-1003 at row ratio 1:1 gave significantly maximum seed yield over other treatments.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Material
- HHB-67e1
- Treatment
- row ratio 1:1e3
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Comparator
- other treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant”
e3“in row ratio 1:1 resulted significantly maximum seed yield over other treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearlmillet cultivar Raj 171 with clusterbean at row ratio 1:1 gave significantly maximum stover and biological yield.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Material
- Raj 171e5
- Treatment
- Pearlmillet cultivar Raj 171e5
- Outcome
- stover and biological yielde6
- Direction
- significantly maximume4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant”
e5“Pearlmillet cultivar Raj 171”
e4“resulted in significantly maximum”
e6“stover and biological yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearlmillet HHB-67 with clusterbean RGC-986 at row ratio 1:3 was superior to all intercropping treatments in PMEY, net returns and B:C ratio.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- row ratio 1:3e7
- Outcome
- PMEY, net returns and B:C ratioe7
- Direction
- superiore7
- Comparator
- all the intercropping treatmentse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant”
e7“in row ratio 1:3 was superior to all the intercropping treatments in terms of PMEY, net returns and B:C ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearlmillet HHB-67 with clusterbean RGC-986 at row ratio 2:2 had the maximum land equivalent ratio among all treatments.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- row ratio 2:2e3
- Outcome
- LERe2
- Direction
- maximume3
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant”
e2“But LER”
e3“in row ratio 2:2 was maximum among all the treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.