Paper · 2006 · Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science

Impact of neem and extracts of some plants on development and fecundity of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae).

Selime Ölmez Bayhan; Erol Bayhan; M. Rıfat Ulusoy

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BAYHAN, Selime OLMEZ, Erol BAYHAN and M. Rifat ULUSOY, 2006. Impact of neem and extracts of some plants on development and fecundity of Aphis gossypii glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 12: 779-785 Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid for many decades. The plant extracts and neem clearly reduced adult longevity, survival rate, fecundity, and life table parameters. The highest survival rate was obtained for the control aphid, following on treated with Red gum (67.62 %), and with California pepper tree (87.64 %), while the aphid treated with neem this rate was zero. Fecundity always tended to be higher in untreated of the aphid than in the treated with plant extracts. Production of offspring from treated adult aphid was lower than that of the control aphid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts and neem reduced adult longevity, survival rate and fecundity of the cotton aphid

Treatment
plant extracts and neeme1
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiit0pest
Outcome
adult longevity, survival rate, fecunditye1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plant extracts and neem clearly reduced adult longevity, survival rate, fecundity, and life table parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts and neem reduced life table parameters of the cotton aphid

Treatment
plant extracts and neeme1
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiit0pest
Outcome
life table parameterse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plant extracts and neem clearly reduced adult longevity, survival rate, fecundity, and life table parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem reduced aphid survival rate to zero compared with the control aphid

Treatment
neeme2
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiit0pest
Outcome
survival ratee2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
zeroe2
Comparator
control aphide2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest survival rate was obtained for the control aphid, following on treated with Red gum (67.62 %), and with California pepper tree (87.64 %), while the aphid treated with neem this rate was zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red gum extract gave a lower aphid survival rate (67.62 %) than the control

Treatment
Red gume2
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiit0pest
Outcome
survival ratee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
67.62 %e2
Comparator
control aphide2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest survival rate was obtained for the control aphid, following on treated with Red gum (67.62 %), and with California pepper tree (87.64 %), while the aphid treated with neem this rate was zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

California pepper tree extract gave a lower aphid survival rate (87.64 %) than the control

Treatment
California pepper treee2
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiit0pest
Outcome
survival ratee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
87.64 %e2
Comparator
control aphide2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest survival rate was obtained for the control aphid, following on treated with Red gum (67.62 %), and with California pepper tree (87.64 %), while the aphid treated with neem this rate was zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fecundity of the cotton aphid tended to be higher on untreated plants than on plant extract treatment

Treatment
plant extractse3
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiit0pest
Outcome
Fecunditye3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
always tended toe3
Comparator
untreatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–325 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fecundity always tended to be higher in untreated of the aphid than in the treated with plant extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Offspring production of treated adult aphids was lower than that of the control aphid

Treatment
treated adult aphide4
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiit0pest
Outcome
Production of offspringe4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
control aphide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton farmers in the Mediterranean region, Turkey, have used synthetic insecticides against the cotton aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–325 · show in text ↑
e4

“Production of offspring from treated adult aphid was lower than that of the control aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–96 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.