Paper · 2014 · Journal of Food Legumes

Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L) to establishment methods and nutrient management practices in rice – greengram cropping system

TR Mohanty; PK Roul; SK Maity

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted to study the residual effects of different rice establishment methods and nutrient management practices as well as direct effect of different nutrient management practices on performance of greengram in a rice-greengram cropping system during Rabi 2009–10 and 2010–11. Residual effect of organic nutrition in rice produced the highest pods/plant (18.1), seeds/pod (10.1), seed yield (852 kg/ha), net return (23554/ha) and return per rupee invested (2.56). 50% RDF + BF application to greengram recorded the highest seed yield (930 kg/ha) which was 10.7 and 64.9% higher than RDF and no fertilizer application, respectively. This treatment also recorded the highest gross return (41956/ha), net return (26980/ha) and return/rupee invested (2.80).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual organic nutrition in rice gave the highest pods per plant in greengram.

Treatment
Residual effect of organic nutrition in ricee0
Outcome
pods/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Residual effect of organic nutrition in rice produced the highest pods/plant (18.1), seeds/pod (10.1), seed yield (852 kg/ha), net return (23554/ha) and return per rupee invested (2.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual organic nutrition in rice gave the highest seeds per pod in greengram.

Treatment
Residual effect of organic nutrition in ricee0
Outcome
seeds/pode0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Residual effect of organic nutrition in rice produced the highest pods/plant (18.1), seeds/pod (10.1), seed yield (852 kg/ha), net return (23554/ha) and return per rupee invested (2.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual organic nutrition in rice gave the highest seed yield of greengram, 852 kg/ha.

Treatment
Residual effect of organic nutrition in ricee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
852 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Residual effect of organic nutrition in rice produced the highest pods/plant (18.1), seeds/pod (10.1), seed yield (852 kg/ha), net return (23554/ha) and return per rupee invested (2.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual organic nutrition in rice gave the highest net return in greengram, 23554/ha.

Treatment
Residual effect of organic nutrition in ricee0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
23554/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Residual effect of organic nutrition in rice produced the highest pods/plant (18.1), seeds/pod (10.1), seed yield (852 kg/ha), net return (23554/ha) and return per rupee invested (2.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual organic nutrition in rice gave the highest return per rupee invested in greengram, 2.56.

Treatment
Residual effect of organic nutrition in ricee0
Outcome
return per rupee investede0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.56e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Residual effect of organic nutrition in rice produced the highest pods/plant (18.1), seeds/pod (10.1), seed yield (852 kg/ha), net return (23554/ha) and return per rupee invested (2.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF + BF application gave the highest seed yield of greengram, 930 kg/ha.

Treatment
50% RDF + BF applicatione1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
930 kg/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% RDF + BF application to greengram recorded the highest seed yield (930 kg/ha) which was 10.7 and 64.9% higher than RDF and no fertilizer application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield of greengram under 50% RDF + BF was 10.7% higher than under RDF.

Treatment
50% RDF + BF applicatione1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
10.7e1
Comparator
RDFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% RDF + BF application to greengram recorded the highest seed yield (930 kg/ha) which was 10.7 and 64.9% higher than RDF and no fertilizer application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield of greengram under 50% RDF + BF was 64.9% higher than with no fertilizer application.

Treatment
50% RDF + BF applicatione1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
64.9%e1
Comparator
no fertilizer applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% RDF + BF application to greengram recorded the highest seed yield (930 kg/ha) which was 10.7 and 64.9% higher than RDF and no fertilizer application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–650 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF + BF application gave the highest gross return in greengram, 41956/ha.

Treatment
50% RDF + BF applicatione1
Outcome
gross returne2
Direction
higheste2
Value
41956/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% RDF + BF application to greengram recorded the highest seed yield (930 kg/ha) which was 10.7 and 64.9% higher than RDF and no fertilizer application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–650 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment also recorded the highest gross return (41956/ha), net return (26980/ha) and return/rupee invested (2.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–772 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF + BF application gave the highest net return in greengram, 26980/ha.

Treatment
50% RDF + BF applicatione1
Outcome
net returne2
Direction
higheste2
Value
26980/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% RDF + BF application to greengram recorded the highest seed yield (930 kg/ha) which was 10.7 and 64.9% higher than RDF and no fertilizer application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–650 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment also recorded the highest gross return (41956/ha), net return (26980/ha) and return/rupee invested (2.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–772 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF + BF application gave the highest return per rupee invested in greengram, 2.80.

Treatment
50% RDF + BF applicatione1
Outcome
return/rupee investede2
Direction
higheste2
Value
2.80e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% RDF + BF application to greengram recorded the highest seed yield (930 kg/ha) which was 10.7 and 64.9% higher than RDF and no fertilizer application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–650 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment also recorded the highest gross return (41956/ha), net return (26980/ha) and return/rupee invested (2.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–772 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.