Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition

Influence of Copper Application on Forage Yield and Quality of Oats Fodder in Copper Deficient Soils

Janpriya Kaur; Deedar Singh Bhatti; Meenakshi Goyal

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of differential doses of Cu on yield, micronutrient content, uptake and quality traits of oats fodder. The soil of the area had pH-7.42, EC-0.25 dS/m, organic carbon 0.35%, available P 13.53 kg/ha, available K 225 kg/ha. The diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe levels were 0.16, 2.26, 4.23 and 5.60 μg/g soil, respectively. Copper was applied to the soil @ 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 kg Cu/ha in form of copper sulphate. The study was conducted using randomized block design with four replications. Application of Cu up to 6 kg/ha improved (P<0.05) fodder yield, Cu, CP and total ash content while there was decrease (P<0.05) in NDF, ADF and cellulose content of oats fodder indicating that Cu application up to this level improved the fodder quality of oats. There was no significant effect of Cu application on concentration of Zn, Fe and Mn in oats fodder. Hence, Cu may be applied @ 6 kg/ha for better yield and quality of oats fodder in Cu deficient sandy loam soils of Punjab.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper application up to 6 kg/ha increased oat fodder yield, copper content, crude protein and total ash.

Taxon
oats foddere0
Treatment
Cu up to 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
fodder yield, Cu, CP and total ash contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Cu up to 6 kg/ha improved (P<0.05) fodder yield, Cu, CP and total ash content while there was decrease (P<0.05) in NDF, ADF and cellulose content of oats fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper application up to 6 kg/ha decreased NDF, ADF and cellulose content of oat fodder.

Taxon
oats foddere0
Treatment
Cu up to 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
NDF, ADF and cellulose contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Cu up to 6 kg/ha improved (P<0.05) fodder yield, Cu, CP and total ash content while there was decrease (P<0.05) in NDF, ADF and cellulose content of oats fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper application had no significant effect on zinc, iron and manganese concentrations in oat fodder.

Taxon
oats foddere0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of Zn, Fe and Mne0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant effect of Cu application on concentration of Zn, Fe and Mn in oats fodder.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–939 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying copper at 6 kg/ha for oat fodder yield and quality in copper deficient Punjab soils.

Taxon
oats foddere0
Treatment
Cu may be applied @ 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
better yield and qualitye0
Setting
Punjabe0

Verbatim

e0

“Cu may be applied @ 6 kg/ha for better yield and quality of oats fodder in Cu deficient sandy loam soils of Punjab.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1062 · show in text ↑

copper atom · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.