Paper · 2012 · Journal of Biopesticides

EVALUATION OF AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF FIVE PLANTS IN THE CONTROL OF FLEA BEETLES ON OKRA (ABELMOSCHUS ESCULENTUS (L.) MOENCH

Onunkun O

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The emergence ofbiodegradable pesticides as safe option has reduced the problems that resultfrom the use of synthetic insecticides, thus creating a renewed interest intheir development and use in integrated pest management of crops. The objectiveof this study was to investigate the insecticidal properties of the water extractsof Jatropha curcas, Vernonia amygdalina, Ageratum conyzoides, Chromolaenaodorata (L) and Annona squamosa on two species of flea beetles (Podagricauniforma and P. sjostedti (Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae)infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4).The leaves and seeds of the plants used in the experiment were collected fromthe locality, washed and shade dried. A synthetic insecticide,lambda-cyhalothrin (karate) was included in the treatments as a standard checkalongside the untreated (control). The experiment was laid out in a randomizedcomplete block design (RCBD) with seven treatments and four replicates. Theefficacy of the treatments was based on reduction in flea beetles and percentagereduction in population of the pests. The results showed that only three of theplant extracts (Jatropha curcas, Vernonia amygdalina and Annona squamosa)significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the population of the two flea beetles at64%, 55% and 49%, respectively. Though the other two botanicals were notsignificant in reducing the population of the pests, they were better than thecontrol. All the plant extracts tested were not as effective as the syntheticinsecticide in reducing flea beetles population. Among the tested plants, J.curcas, was found to be more effective, hence its use by resource poorfarmers is recommended in the protection of okra against the infestation of P.uniforma and P. sjostedti.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jatropha curcas extract significantly reduced the flea beetle population by 64% relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
Jatropha curcase1
Interactor
flea beetlesAlticinie2pest
Outcome
population of the two flea beetlese2
Direction
reducede2
Value
64%e2
Comparator
untreated (control)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jatropha curcas, Vernonia amygdalina and Annona squamosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1201 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the population of the two flea beetles at64%, 55% and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1306 · show in text ↑
e3

“alongside the untreated (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vernonia amygdalina extract significantly reduced the flea beetle population by 55% relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
Vernonia amygdalinae1
Interactor
flea beetlesAlticinie2pest
Outcome
population of the two flea beetlese2
Direction
reducede2
Value
55%e2
Comparator
untreated (control)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jatropha curcas, Vernonia amygdalina and Annona squamosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1201 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the population of the two flea beetles at64%, 55% and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1306 · show in text ↑
e3

“alongside the untreated (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Annona squamosa extract significantly reduced the flea beetle population by 49% relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
Annona squamosae1
Interactor
flea beetlesAlticinie2pest
Outcome
population of the two flea beetlese2
Direction
reducede2
Value
49%e2
Comparator
untreated (control)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jatropha curcas, Vernonia amygdalina and Annona squamosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1201 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the population of the two flea beetles at64%, 55% and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1306 · show in text ↑
e3

“alongside the untreated (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The other two botanical extracts did not significantly reduce flea beetle populations but were better than the control.

Treatment
other two botanicalse4
Outcome
population of the pestse4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598 · show in text ↑
e4

“Though the other two botanicals were notsignificant in reducing the population of the pests, they were better than thecontrol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested plant extracts were less effective than the synthetic insecticide in reducing flea beetle populations.

Treatment
plant extractse5
Interactor
flea beetlesAlticinie5pest
Outcome
reducing flea beetles populatione5
Direction
lowerinferrede5
Comparator
synthetic insecticidee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598 · show in text ↑
e5

“All the plant extracts tested were not as effective as the syntheticinsecticide in reducing flea beetles population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jatropha curcas was more effective than the other tested plants against flea beetles on okra.

Treatment
J.curcase6
Outcome
effectivee6
Direction
more effectivee6
Comparator
tested plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598 · show in text ↑
e6

“Among the tested plants, J.curcas, was found to be more effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1617 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Use of J. curcas by resource-poor farmers is recommended for protecting okra against P. uniforma and P. sjostedti.

Interactor
P.uniformae7pest
Second interactor
P. sjostedtie7pest
Outcome
protection of okrae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“infesting okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), variety NHAE 47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–598 · show in text ↑
e7

“its use by resource poorfarmers is recommended in the protection of okra against the infestation of P.uniforma and P. sjostedti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1752 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 51 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.