Paper · 2006 · Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists

Quality Risks Associated with the Utilization of Fusarium Head Blight Infected Malting Barley

P. B. Schwarz; R. D. Horsley; B. J. Steffenson; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractFusarium head blight (FHB) has adversely affected the quality of barley grown in the northern Great Plains of the United States and the eastern Prairie Provinces of Canada since 1993. Objectives of this study were to document the occurrence of deoxynivalenol (DON) on barley within North Dakota and Minnesota, investigate relationships among FHB, DON, and malt quality, and to determine at what level FHB/DON-contaminated barley can be safely utilized for the production of quality malt. Since 1993, mean DON levels have ranged from 10.3 to 0.4 μg/g, with a corresponding 81 to 32% of the regional barley crop in excess of 0.5 μg/g. Strong relationships were not observed between either kernel size or kernel weight and DON. As a consequence, cleaning is unlikely to achieve significant reductions in DON levels in most cases. In terms of barley and malt quality, the strongest relationships were observed between barley DON and malt DON and malt DON and wort color. However, malt DON levels could not be reliably predicted from barley at <1.0 μg/g. Barley with a DON level of <1.0 μg/g produced acceptable malt.RESUMENEl destrozo de la cabeza de Fusarium (FHB) ha afectado adversamente la calidad de la cebada cultivada en los Grandes Llanos norteños de Estados Unidos y las Praderas Provinciales del este de Canadá desde 1993. Los objetivos de este estudio eran documentar la ocurrencia de deoxinivalenol (DON) en cebada dentro Dakota Norte y Minnesota, investigar relaciones entre FHB, DON, y calidad de malta, y determinar hasta que nivel puede ser utilizada con seguridad la cebada contaminada con FHB/DON en la producción de malta de calidad. Desde 1993, el nivel medio de DON se ha extendido de 10.3 a 0.4 μg/g, con el correspondiente 81 a 32% de la cosecha regional de cebada en exceso de 0.5 μg/g. Relaciones fuertes no fueron observadas entre el tamaño de grano, peso de grano y DON. Por consiguiente, es poco probable que la limpieza alcance reducciones significativas de niveles de DON en la mayoría de los casos. En términos de calidad de cebada y malta, las relaciones más fuertes fueron observadas entre DON de cebada y DON de malta y DON de malta y color de mosto. Sin embargo, los niveles de DON en malta no se pudieron predecir seguramente en cebada con <1.0 μg/g. La cebada con un nivel de DON <1.0 μg/g produjo malta aceptable.KeywordsAssortmentCluster analysisDeoxynivalenolKernel weightMalt qualityMycotoxinPalabras clave: Análisis de grupoCalidad de maltaDeoxinivalenolMicotoxinaPeso de granoSurtido

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Since 1993, mean DON levels in barley ranged from 10.3 to 0.4 μg/g.

Outcome
mean DON levelse1
Value
10.3 to 0.4 μg/ge1
Qualifier
Since 1993e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Since 1993, mean DON levels have ranged from 10.3 to 0.4 μg/g, with a corresponding 81 to 32% of the regional barley crop in excess of 0.5 μg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–639 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Since 1993, 81 to 32% of the regional barley crop exceeded 0.5 μg/g DON.

Outcome
regional barley crop in excess of 0.5 μg/ge1
Value
81 to 32%e1
Qualifier
Since 1993e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Since 1993, mean DON levels have ranged from 10.3 to 0.4 μg/g, with a corresponding 81 to 32% of the regional barley crop in excess of 0.5 μg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–639 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel size and kernel weight had no strong relationship with DON in malting barley.

Taxon
Malting Barleyt0
Compound
DONe2
Outcome
kernel size or kernel weighte2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Risks Associated with the Utilization of Fusarium Head Blight Infected Malting Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“Strong relationships were not observed between either kernel size or kernel weight and DON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–731 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning is unlikely to achieve significant reductions in DON levels of malting barley in most cases.

Taxon
Malting Barleyt0
Treatment
cleaninge3
Outcome
DON levelse3

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Risks Associated with the Utilization of Fusarium Head Blight Infected Malting Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“As a consequence, cleaning is unlikely to achieve significant reductions in DON levels in most cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–833 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strongest relationship in barley was between barley DON and malt DON.

Compound
barley DONe4
Outcome
malt DONe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In terms of barley and malt quality, the strongest relationships were observed between barley DON and malt DON and malt DON and wort color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–973 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strongest relationship in barley was between malt DON and wort color.

Compound
malt DONe4
Outcome
wort colore4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In terms of barley and malt quality, the strongest relationships were observed between barley DON and malt DON and malt DON and wort color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malt DON levels could not be reliably predicted from barley DON at levels below 1.0 μg/g.

Outcome
malt DON levels could not be reliably predicted from barleye5
Qualifier
at <1.0 μg/ge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“However, malt DON levels could not be reliably predicted from barley at <1.0 μg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1056 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley with DON below 1.0 μg/g produced acceptable malt.

Outcome
acceptable malte6
Qualifier
with a DON level of <1.0 μg/ge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Barley with a DON level of <1.0 μg/g produced acceptable malt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1119 · show in text ↑