Paper · 1995 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of intercropping oilseed and pulse crops in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) for total productivity and monetary advantage in the system

Ramani Kumar Sarkar; A. Chakraborty; Reena Majumdar

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1990-91 and 1991-92 to study the effect of inter cropping oilseed crops [sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)] and a pulse crop [greengram (phaseolus radiatus L.)] in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for information on total productivity and monetary advantage in the system. Intercropping of 2 rows of greengram in paired-row planted upland cotton gave higher cotton-equivalent yield (2 40B kg/ha) and monetary advantage (Rs 6 143/ha) than sole cropping of upland cotton (1 393 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two greengram rows intercropped with paired-row upland cotton raised cotton-equivalent yield to 2 40B kg/ha versus 1 393 kg/ha for sole cotton.

Taxon
upland cottone0
Treatment
Intercropping of 2 rows of greengram in paired-row planted upland cottone0
Interactor
greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0other
Outcome
cotton-equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2 40B kg/hae0
Qualifier
1 393 kg/hae0
Comparator
sole cropping of upland cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Interactor · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of 2 rows of greengram in paired-row planted upland cotton gave higher cotton-equivalent yield (2 40B kg/ha) and monetary advantage (Rs 6 143/ha) than sole cropping of upland cotton (1 393 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two greengram rows intercropped with paired-row cotton produced Rs 6 143/ha monetary advantage over sole cotton.

Taxon
upland cottone0
Treatment
Intercropping of 2 rows of greengram in paired-row planted upland cottone0
Interactor
greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0other
Outcome
monetary advantagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs 6 143/hae0
Comparator
sole cropping of upland cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Interactor · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of 2 rows of greengram in paired-row planted upland cotton gave higher cotton-equivalent yield (2 40B kg/ha) and monetary advantage (Rs 6 143/ha) than sole cropping of upland cotton (1 393 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–592 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

104 papers: 85 positive, 19 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.