Paper · 2004

Influence of reduced tillage on wheat quality properties

Mirjana Sabo; Danijel Jug; Žaneta Ugarčić-Hardi

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of reduced tillage on the wheat quality properties during 2000/2001 vegetation year on Kneževo experimental site were determined in Croatian Baranya region. The most stable wheat yield, highly 1000 kernel weight and hectoliter mass was achieved by conventional tillage and disc harrowing (fine tilth). As disc harrowing (fine tilth) did not significantly reduce grain yield, 1000 kernel weight and hectoliter mass of the experimental year, this tillage system could, therefore, be considered favorable for wheat growing. Disc harrowing followed by soil loosening with chisel produced equal soil physical conditions, if not better, than conventional tillage and since grain yield and wheat quality properties were even slightly better than conventional tillage, this variant should present suitable replacement for ploughing. No-tillage resulted in highly significant grain yield decrease, 1000 kernel weight, hectoliter mass and rheological properties in comparison to all other variants of tillage. Reduced tillage had a statistically significant influence on the milling extraction flour, quality number and maximal viscosity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage and fine disc harrowing gave the most stable yield, high kernel weight and hectoliter mass.

Treatment
conventional tillage and disc harrowing (fine tilth)e0
Outcome
wheat yield, highly 1000 kernel weight and hectoliter masse0
Direction
most stablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most stable wheat yield, highly 1000 kernel weight and hectoliter mass was achieved by conventional tillage and disc harrowing (fine tilth).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine disc harrowing did not significantly reduce grain yield, kernel weight or hectoliter mass.

Treatment
disc harrowing (fine tilth)e0
Outcome
grain yield, 1000 kernel weight and hectoliter masse0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disc harrowing (fine tilth) did not significantly reduce grain yield, 1000 kernel weight and hectoliter mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–424 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat quality properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel loosening after disc harrowing produced soil physical conditions equal to or better than conventional tillage.

Treatment
Disc harrowing followed by soil loosening with chisele0
Outcome
soil physical conditionse0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disc harrowing followed by soil loosening with chisel produced equal soil physical conditions, if not better, than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat quality properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel loosening after disc harrowing gave slightly better grain yield and wheat quality than conventional tillage.

Treatment
Disc harrowing followed by soil loosening with chisele1
Outcome
grain yield and wheat quality propertiese0
Direction
slightly bettere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield and wheat quality properties were even slightly better than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–770 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disc harrowing followed by soil loosening with chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–585 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend chisel loosening after disc harrowing as a replacement for ploughing.

Treatment
Disc harrowing followed by soil loosening with chisele1
Outcome
suitable replacement for ploughinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this variant should present suitable replacement for ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disc harrowing followed by soil loosening with chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–585 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat quality properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage significantly decreased wheat grain yield, kernel weight, hectoliter mass and rheological properties versus all other tillage variants.

Treatment
No-tillagee0
Outcome
grain yield decrease, 1000 kernel weight, hectoliter mass and rheological propertiese0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
all other variants of tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-tillage resulted in highly significant grain yield decrease, 1000 kernel weight, hectoliter mass and rheological properties in comparison to all other variants of tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat quality properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage significantly influenced milling extraction flour, quality number and maximal viscosity.

Treatment
Reduced tillagee0
Outcome
milling extraction flour, quality number and maximal viscositye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced tillage had a statistically significant influence on the milling extraction flour, quality number and maximal viscosity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat quality properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–56 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.