Paper · 1997 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Allelopathy of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) on cotton (Gossypium)

Gerardo Martinez-Díaz

19
claims
33
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of extracts from purple nutsedge tubers were determined on the germination, growth, root leakage, water status, and photosynthesis of an Upland cotton, DPL 5415, and a Pima cotton, Pima S-7. Tubers extracts inhibited secondary root growth of seedlings more than primary root growth. At 500 ppmw, primary root growth was inhibited 44 percent whereas inhibition of secondary root growth was 64 percent. Non-polar extracts were more inhibitory to growth than polar extracts. Cotton plants grown in soil treated with hexane extracts of tubers containing non-polar allelopathic substances also lost electrolytes from their roots indicating an effect on root function. The effects on root function resulted in perturbations to the capacity of the plants to maintain efficient water status. At 250 ppmw of the hexane extract, the plant water potential, the leaf water content, and the leaf osmotic potential decreased from -0.7 to -1.3 MPa, from 89 to 79 percent, and from -0.8 to -1.0 MPa, respectively. In addition, the photosynthetic capacity of cotton was decreased 50 percent in both cotton cultivars in the second and third day after transplanting to soil treated with 62 ppmw of the hexane extracts. Leaf dehydration to below 70 percent relative water content and a reduction of quantum yield was detected in DPL 5415 at 125 ppmw of the hexane extracts. However, Pima S-7 was capable of tolerating higher levels of dehydration and did not show the reduction of quantum yield. Leaf expansion and epicotyl growth were also inhibited by 30 and 37 percent, respectively, by the hexane extracts at 250 ppmw. Purple nutsedge tubers released volatile substances that inhibited growth when trapped and tested on cotton seedlings, and caused root leakage. GC analyses showed that both the hexane extracts of purple nutsedge tubers and the volatile compounds released from the tubers contained substances with retention times that are characteristic of sesquiterpenes. These results demonstrate that purple nutsedge tubers contain allelopathic substances capable of inhibiting the growth of cotton by interfering with membranes of root cells, disrupting water status, and affecting photosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber extracts inhibited cotton secondary root growth more than primary root growth.

Treatment
Tubers extractse0
Outcome
secondary root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
primary root growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tubers extracts inhibited secondary root growth of seedlings more than primary root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–293 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 500 ppmw, primary root growth was inhibited 44 percent.

Treatment
500 ppmwe0
Outcome
primary root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
44 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 500 ppmw, primary root growth was inhibited 44 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 500 ppmw, secondary root growth was inhibited 64 percent.

Outcome
secondary root growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
64 percente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibition of secondary root growth was 64 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-polar extracts inhibited cotton growth more than polar extracts.

Treatment
Non-polar extractse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
more inhibitorye0
Comparator
polar extractse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-polar extracts were more inhibitory to growth than polar extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexane tuber extracts caused root electrolyte loss.

Treatment
hexane extracts of tuberse0
Outcome
lost electrolytes from their rootse0
Direction
loste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants grown in soil treated with hexane extracts of tubers containing non-polar allelopathic substances also lost electrolytes from their roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 ppmw, plant water potential fell from -0.7 to -1.3 MPa.

Treatment
250 ppmw of the hexane extracte0
Outcome
plant water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-0.7 to -1.3 MPae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 250 ppmw of the hexane extract, the plant water potential, the leaf water content, and the leaf osmotic potential decreased from -0.7 to -1.3 MPa, from 89 to 79 percent, and from -0.8 to -1.0 MPa, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 ppmw, leaf water content fell from 89 to 79 percent.

Outcome
leaf water contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
89 to 79 percente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf water content, and the leaf osmotic potential decreased from -0.7 to -1.3 MPa, from 89 to 79 percent, and from -0.8 to -1.0 MPa, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 ppmw, leaf osmotic potential fell from -0.8 to -1.0 MPa.

Outcome
leaf osmotic potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-0.8 to -1.0 MPae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf osmotic potential decreased from -0.7 to -1.3 MPa, from 89 to 79 percent, and from -0.8 to -1.0 MPa, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic capacity fell 50 percent in both cotton cultivars after 62 ppmw treatment.

Treatment
62 ppmw of the hexane extractse0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
50 percente0
Qualifier
second and third daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic capacity of cotton was decreased 50 percent in both cotton cultivars in the second and third day after transplanting to soil treated with 62 ppmw of the hexane extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPL 5415 leaves dehydrated below 70 percent relative water content at 125 ppmw.

Material
DPL 5415e0
Treatment
125 ppmw of the hexane extractse0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
dehydratione0
Value
below 70 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf dehydration to below 70 percent relative water content and a reduction of quantum yield was detected in DPL 5415 at 125 ppmw of the hexane extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPL 5415 quantum yield fell at 125 ppmw.

Material
DPL 5415e0
Treatment
125 ppmw of the hexane extractse0
Outcome
quantum yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a reduction of quantum yield was detected in DPL 5415 at 125 ppmw of the hexane extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pima S-7 tolerated greater dehydration without reduced quantum yield.

Material
Pima S-7e0
Outcome
quantum yielde0
Direction
did not show the reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pima S-7 was capable of tolerating higher levels of dehydration and did not show the reduction of quantum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf expansion was inhibited 30 percent by 250 ppmw hexane extract.

Treatment
hexane extracts at 250 ppmwe0
Outcome
Leaf expansione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
30 and 37 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf expansion and epicotyl growth were also inhibited by 30 and 37 percent, respectively, by the hexane extracts at 250 ppmw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epicotyl growth was inhibited 37 percent by 250 ppmw hexane extract.

Treatment
hexane extracts at 250 ppmwe0
Outcome
epicotyl growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
37 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf expansion and epicotyl growth were also inhibited by 30 and 37 percent, respectively, by the hexane extracts at 250 ppmw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapped volatile substances from purple nutsedge tubers inhibited cotton seedling growth.

Treatment
volatile substancese0
Interactor
Purple nutsedgee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Purple nutsedge tubers released volatile substances that inhibited growth when trapped and tested on cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purple nutsedge volatiles caused cotton root leakage.

Treatment
volatile substancese0
Interactor
Purple nutsedgee0
Outcome
root leakagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Purple nutsedge tubers released volatile substances that inhibited growth when trapped and tested on cotton seedlings, and caused root leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1757 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexane extracts contained substances with sesquiterpene-like retention times.

Outcome
substances with retention times that are characteristic of sesquiterpenese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the hexane extracts of purple nutsedge tubers and the volatile compounds released from the tubers contained substances with retention times that are characteristic of sesquiterpenes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1969 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purple nutsedge tuber volatiles contained substances with sesquiterpene-like retention times.

Outcome
substances with retention times that are characteristic of sesquiterpenese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the volatile compounds released from the tubers contained substances with retention times that are characteristic of sesquiterpenes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1969 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute cotton growth inhibition to root membrane, water status and photosynthesis disruption.

Interactor
purple nutsedgee0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
interfering with membranes of root cells, disrupting water status, and affecting photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“purple nutsedge tubers contain allelopathic substances capable of inhibiting the growth of cotton by interfering with membranes of root cells, disrupting water status, and affecting photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2002–2198 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 21 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.