Paper · 2016 · Energy Sustainability and Society

Root biomass and soil carbon response to growing perennial grasses for bioenergy

Leonard C. Kibet; Humberto Blanco-Canqui; Robert B. Mitchell; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dedicated bioenergy crops such as switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), miscanthus [Miscanthus x giganteus (Mxg)], indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash], and big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman) can provide cellulosic feedstock for biofuel production while maintaining or improving soil and environmental quality. To better understand bioenergy crop effects on soils, we studied changes in soil properties of a Tomek silt loam under inorganic fertilization of switchgrass after 4 years and warm-season grass monocultures and mixtures after 6 years in eastern Nebraska. The first experiment had two study factors: two switchgrass harvest dates (August and November) and nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilization rates. Nitrogen fertilizer levels (0, 60, and 120 kg N ha−1) were the main plots, while P levels (0, 22, and 44 kg P ha−1) were the split plots and K levels (0, 11, and 22 kg K ha−1) were the split-split plots. The second experiment included six bioenergy feedstocks comprised of four monocultures [switchgrass (cv. Shawnee and an experimental strain tracked as Kanlow N1), indiangrass (Chief), and miscanthus (Mxg)] and two mixtures [big bluestem (Goldmine) + indiangrass (Warrior) + switchgrass (Shawnee) and big bluestem (Bonanza) + indiangrass (Scout) + switchgrass (Shawnee)]. Soil samples were analyzed for root biomass, soil organic C (SOC), total N, bulk density, aggregate stability, and pH. In the first experiment, inorganic fertilization and harvest dates had no effect on switchgrass root biomass, SOC pools, soil aggregate stability, and other properties. In the second experiment, cumulative root biomass under Chief indiangrass monoculture was lower than that under other grass monocultures and mixtures except miscanthus. These results suggest that inorganic fertilization and harvest dates do not affect soil properties in the short term, but Chief indiangrass monoculture may have lower root biomass than other grasses. Overall, fertilization management did not induce changes in root biomass and soil properties, but Chief indiangrass monoculture had lower cumulative root biomass compared with mixtures and switchgrass monocultures, suggesting that cultivar selection will affect root biomass accumulation. Further monitoring is needed to determine long-term changes in root biomass and soil properties under these bioenergy crop systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization and harvest dates had no effect on switchgrass root biomass.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatume0
Treatment
inorganic fertilization and harvest datese0
Outcome
switchgrass root biomasse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inorganic fertilization and harvest dates had no effect on switchgrass root biomass, SOC pools, soil aggregate stability, and other properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization and harvest dates had no effect on soil organic carbon pools and aggregate stability under switchgrass.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatume0
Treatment
inorganic fertilization and harvest datese0
Outcome
SOC pools, soil aggregate stabilitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inorganic fertilization and harvest dates had no effect on switchgrass root biomass, SOC pools, soil aggregate stability, and other properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chief indiangrass monoculture had lower cumulative root biomass than mixtures and switchgrass monocultures.

Taxon
indiangrasse0
Material
Chiefe0
Treatment
Chief indiangrass monoculturee0
Outcome
cumulative root biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
mixtures and switchgrass monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“Chief indiangrass monoculture had lower cumulative root biomass compared with mixtures and switchgrass monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2075–2190 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Panicum virgatum (switchgrass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · growth · Panicum virgatum (switchgrass)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.